Zionism: It is the canker that is eating the blossom.

Israel is not a state. It never acts like civilized States. With every passing day the ugly face of Israel is exposed more and more. With every singular Israeli project, you see the Israeli colonial ambitions; Israel's desire to destroy her neighbors.

Over 4000 homes destroyed, $2 billion worth of damage, 51,000 residents displaced, 400,000 Palestinians left without running water, and many, many children killed.

• The terrorist state of Israel has shown itself to be a rogue state, even by the standards of the imperialist bourgeoisie. The massacre and mass murder being perpetrated in the Gaza Strip is part of Israel’s genocidal program of the ethnic cleansing and purification of occupied Palestine to make room for the “Greater Israel.” Even the capitalist media is highly critical of the attacks. Despite Israel’s excuse that the attack was focused mainly on Hamas, most of the violence fell upon the heads of Palestinian civilians.

Most Jews do not want to know the facts and documented truth of history as it relates to the making and sustaining of conflict in and over Palestine that became Israel.

• In his seminal book, Israel's Fateful Hour, published in Hebrew in 1986 and English two years later, Israel's Director of Military Intelligence, Yehoshafat Harkabi, wrote these warning words: "Israel is the criterion according to which all Jews will tend to be judged. Israel as a Jewish state is an example of the Jewish character, which finds free and concentrated expression within it. Anti-Semitism has deep and historical roots. Nevertheless, any flaw in Israeli conduct, which initially is cited as anti-Israelism, is likely to be transformed into empirical proof of the validity of anti-Semitism. It would be a tragic irony if the Jewish state, which was intended to solve the problem of anti-Semitism, was to become a factor in the rise of anti-Semitism. Israelis must be aware that the price of their misconduct is paid not only by them but also Jews throughout the world."

USS Liberty & Turkish Flotilla parallel

It is obvious - as it is to the relatively small number of Jews who are aware of the truth of history and have the courage to speak out - that Jewish ignorance and/or denial of the truth of history has got to be ended if the Jews are to play their necessary part in stopping the monster of anti-Semitism going on the rampage again in a foreseeable future.

Almost all Arabs and many other Muslims have always known the difference between Judaism and Zionism; and that's why, historically speaking, they said in their various ways, and meant, "Our enemy is Zionism and Zionists, not Jews as Jews". It is a fact that prior to Zionism's colonial enterprise, the Arabs and other Muslims were the best protectors of Jews in need of sanctuary. Look how they were treated in Palestine before the inception of Israel, how they thrived under the Islamic ruling in Spain centuries ago, how they are being treated in Morocco, Iran. And for God sake, do not believe in the Zionist propaganda, when they say otherwise!

The notion that Israel's existence would or could be threatened by a Palestinian mini state on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip with either East Jerusalem its capital or an open Jerusalem the capital of two states, is the fantasy at leadership level of deluded minds.

If there was a Palestinian mini state in existence, and if from it rejectionists launched attacks on Israel and were not contained and put out of action by the Palestinian government's security services, the IDF at a point would crush the mini state out of existence and do so with the understanding of the world.False propaganda is what they are clever at.

Combat boots and you must believe them or else they call you antisemitic

 

Natural Growth or Replacement: They demolish, evict, and then Build their own.

UN chief Ban Ki-moon on Wednesday voiced concern that an Israeli plan to raze 22 Arab homes to make way for an archaeological park in annexed east Jerusalem is “unhelpful” and against international law.

"Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves ... politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves... The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country." - David Ben Gurion, quoted on pp 91-2 of Chomsky's Fateful Triangle, which appears in Simha Flapan's "Zionism and the Palestinians pp 141-2 citing a 1938 speech.

Eshkol Heights

Ban “is deeply concerned about the decision by the Jerusalem Municipality to advance planning for house demolitions and further settlement activity in the area of Silwan in East Jerusalem,” the secretary general’s spokesman Martin Nesirky said in a statement.

"There is no such thing as a Palestinian people... It is not as if we came and threw them out and took their country. They didn't exist." - Golda Meir, statement to The Sunday Times, 15 June, 1969.
"How can we return the occupied territories? There is nobody to return them to." - Golda Meir, March 8, 1969.
"This country exists as the fulfillment of a promise made by God Himself. It would be ridiculous to ask it to account for its legitimacy." - Golda Meir, Le Monde, 15 October 1971

Ban “reminds the Israeli Government of its responsibility to ensure provocative steps are not taken which would heighten tensions in the city. The current moves are unhelpful, coming at a time when the goal must be to build trust to support political negotiations,” the statement added. “The planned moves are contrary to international law, and to the wishes of Palestinian residents,” the statement said.

"We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his question, What is to be done with the Palestinian population?' Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture which said 'Drive them out!'" - Yitzhak Rabin, leaked censored version of Rabin memoirs, published in the New York Times, 23 October 1979.

Ramat Eshkol Property 001

The park, which is planned for a crumbling Arab neighborhood just outside the walls of the Old City, was approved by Jerusalem city council on Monday in a move that drew criticism both at home and abroad.

[The Palestinians] are beasts walking on two legs." - Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, "Begin and the 'Beasts,"' New Statesman, June 25, 1982.
"The Partition of Palestine is illegal. It will never be recognized .... Jerusalem was and will for ever be our capital. Eretz Israel will be restored to the people of Israel. All of it. And for Ever." - Menachem Begin, the day after the U.N. vote to partition Palestine.

Your villa in Caeseria

The plan was put before the city’s planning and building committee on Monday, which approved Gan Hamelech, the Hebrew name for an area outside the Old City known as Al-Bustan to its mostly Arab residents.

"Israel should have exploited the repression of the demonstrations in China, when world attention focused on that country, to carry out mass expulsions among the Arabs of the territories." - Benyamin Netanyahu, then Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister, former Prime Minister of Israel, speaking to students at Bar Ilan University, from the Israeli journal Hotam, November 24, 1989.

Luxury Garden 3-BR Apartment Vacation Rental in Jerusalem

http://enddemolitionsnow.org/petition/Under the plan, 22 homes would be razed, while another 66 would be legalized. The 88 homes all had been slated for demolition because they were built without Israeli permits.

"If we thought that instead of 200 Palestinian fatalities, 2,000 dead would put an end to the fighting at a stroke, we would use much more force...." - Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, quoted in Associated Press, November 16, 2000.
"I would have joined a terrorist organization." - Ehud Barak's response to Gideon Levy, a columnist for the Ha'aretz newspaper, when Barak was asked what he would have done if he had been born a Palestinian.

"It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism, colonialization, or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands." - Ariel Sharon, Israeli Foreign Minister, addressing a meeting of militants from the extreme right-wing Tsomet Party, Agence France Presse, November 15, 1998.
"Everybody has to move, run and grab as many (Palestinian) hilltops as they can to enlarge the (Jewish) settlements because everything we take now will stay ours...Everything we don't grab will go to them." - Ariel Sharon, Israeli Foreign Minister, addressing a meeting of the Tsomet Party, Agence France Presse, Nov. 15, 1998.
"Israel may have the right to put others on trial, but certainly no one has the right to put the Jewish people and the State of Israel on trial." - Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, 25 March, 2001 quoted in BBC News Online.

"A new State of Israel with broad frontiers, strong and solid, with the authority of the Israel Government extending from the Jordan to the Suez Canal." - Moshe Dian.
"Arabs cross to collect the grain that they left in the abandoned villages and we set mines for them and they go back without an arm or a leg." - Moshe Dian.
"Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you because geography books no longer exist." - Moshe Dian.
"Our American friends offer us money, arms, and advice. We take the money, we take the arms, and we decline the advice." - Moshe Dian.
"The method of collective punishment so far has proved effective." - Moshe Dian.
"There is no more Palestine. Finished." - Moshe Dian.
"There is not one single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population." - Moshe Dian.
"We are a generation of settlers, and without the steel helmet and gun barrel, we shall not be able to plant a tree or build a house." - Moshe Dian.

from th quotes of Israel Prime Ministers, one  finds how the Jews are bent on evil, violence, aggression , arrogance and falsification of history. They are a bunch of bullies, thugs, and arrogant criminals.

They are a cancer that should be cut off the body of the global society. If the global human society do not wake up and take a stance now. the cancer cells will multiply - which is the nature of cancer - and infect the whole boy. It will then be too late. So wake up while there is still time.

Click on picture to sign the petition

They nippled on the Palestinian land like a rat does to

a piece of cheese

Guess who did it: Man evicted from his own home and shot in the hand and foot for not running away quicker.

This Palestinian man in the video clip is wiser than so many people out there as he understands what is going on in this world of ours; the American blind support to Israel, the wold government' attitudes towards America and Israel, etc.

However, if you show this video to a Jew, he will argue and talk about: 1. Israel's right to defend herself, 2. terrorist Palestinians, 3. Israel's security, and a whole bunch of other crazy stuff. What can I say? When one stinks, his/her society stinks, his/her government stinks, his/her religious belief stinks, etc. I guess one can not smell the stickiness he/she is living in.

Long live Palistine

Idiocy then and idiocy now: Nothing new under the Sun.

On the high seas, outside territorial waters, the ship was stopped by the navy. The commandos stormed it. Hundreds of people on the deck resisted, the soldiers used force. Some of the passengers were killed, scores injured. The ship was brought into harbor, the passengers were taken off by force. The world saw them walking on the quay, men and women, young and old, all of them worn out, one after another, each being marched between two soldiers.

• Hundreds of people on the deck resisted, the soldiers used force exactly like the activists on the flottilla did. And I find nothing wrong with it, be the resistant Jews or activists.

The ship was called “Exodus 1947”. It left France in the hope of breaking the British blockade, which was imposed to prevent ships loaded with Holocaust survivors from reaching the shores of Palestine. If it had been allowed to reach the country, the illegal immigrants would have come ashore and the British would have sent them to detention camps in Cyprus, as they had done before. Nobody would have taken any notice of the episode for more than two days.

But the person in charge was Ernest Bevin, a Labour Party leader, an arrogant, rude and power-loving British minister. He was not about to let a bunch of Jews dictate to him. He decided to teach them a lesson the entire world would witness. “This is a provocation!” he exclaimed, and of course he was right. The main aim was indeed to create a provocation, in order to draw the eyes of the world to the British blockade.

• The main aim was indeed to create a provocation, in order to draw the eyes of the world to the British blockade. And this is what the flotilla has successfully achieved. Than you Israel for your stupidity.

What followed is well known: the episode dragged on and on, one stupidity led to another, the whole world sympathized with the passengers. But the British did not give in and paid the price. A heavy price.

Later Britain collapsed under the weight of international condemnation and decided to give up its mandate over Palestine. There were, of course, many more weighty reasons for this decision, but the “Exodus” proved to be the straw that broke the camel’s back.

There are, of course, important differences. Then the passengers were Holocaust survivors, this time they were peace activists from all over the world. But then and now the world saw heavily armed soldiers brutally attack unarmed passengers, who resist with everything that comes to hand, sticks and bare hands. Then and now it happened on the high seas – 40 km from the shore then, 65 km now.

In retrospect, the British behavior throughout the affair seems incredibly stupid. But Bevin was no fool, and the British officers who commanded the action were not nincompoops. After all, they had just finished a World War on the winning side. If they behaved with complete folly from beginning to end, it was the result of arrogance, insensitivity and boundless contempt for world public opinion.

Ehud Barak is the Israeli Bevin. He is not a fool, either, nor are the top brass. But they are responsible for a chain of acts of folly, the disastrous implications of which are hard to assess. Former minister and present commentator Yossi Sarid called the ministerial “committee of seven”, which decides on security matters, “seven idiots” – It is an insult to idiots, though.

They are not only idiots, but also criminals

Israel: Behavioral Pattern (Watch how the Jews lie when they get cornered)

In a humorous segment on the Colbert Report, a comedy news show, Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren described to the audience the killing of nine Turkish citizens in the Israeli attack on the Mavi Marmara, a Turkish registered ship in the Freedom Flotilla.

Only hours before, the Flotilla had stopped to honor an American Naval ship, the USS Liberty, attacked by Israel with 34 killed and 171 injured. Israel claimed the American sailors, on a new $43 million dollar communications ship were also terrorists and had been carefully recognized and killed, using machine guns, cannons, napalm and torpedoes. Later, Israel claimed at first that the incident had been done by another country and, later still, claimed it was all a misunderstanding.

Ambassador Oren indicated he was clear this time. The men killed had been selected by Israeli troops and executed as terrorists. He said Israel had conclusive proof that the nine killed had been active in terrorist organizations, were carrying guns and had shot several IDF personnel.

Oren never indicated how the 9 killed were selected or if they were known in advance.

Previously, Israel had claimed the killings were defensive and the victims unknown to them. Oren claims that the victims were proven terrorists.

However, films of the attack indicated something quite different. On examination by Jim W. Dean of Heritage TV, a former US Intelligence Official specializing in analysis of video and voice evidence, it was noted that the films had been altered and the people identified as terrorists were actually Israeli citizens, paid actors, who were put onto the video using a primitive and highly ineffective special effects process not used since the Godzilla films. Dean describes the films: These Photo shopped videos were done so poorly as to be almost comical if they were not done to cover up murders. You will have to watch the video several times to really visually catch their mistakes...The ending scenes on the fantail immediately struck me as a studio shoot. The lighting was way to bright for a ship in that situation. The actors…well…they did a really poor job. In the real videos you see more confusion…the clothes are not right. If there was a completely staged event, even down to the tiny slingshot one guy raises up so it can be noticed. Also, the camera is stationary (on a tripod)…a huge mistake.

When asked how an obviously faked film could be presented on news networks and individuals such as Oren could be allowed to make wild accusations against murder victims without being “called” on it, Dean replied: The real news here is how such an obvious fraud was pipelined into American mass media. Any experienced news video editor would have spotted the obvious fraud on these tapes. But they pushed it right out onto unsuspecting Americans who wrongly think that mass media would not pedal something they know to be totally bogus. And how wrong they are. But it gets worse. Our Intel and security agencies always do frame by frame analysis of important video material like this. They also had to have spotted this…yet they did not warn the American people that this was a fraud. Why not?

With hours of video smuggled out and analysis indicating that Israel forces had never met armed troops, and that Oren’s statements made on national television were totally false, networks in the US have still remained silent.

Colbert then turned to Ambassador Oren and said, “Sir, shouldn’t the Palestinians be subject to the same thing, shouldn’t they be forced to return to where they came from?”


On hearing this, Oren nearly swallowed his tongue. After a stuttering recovery, Oren went onto a short canned” tirade about Palestinians living where Israelis put them, end of story.

Burn in fire

Uri Avnery's Column: My answers to Uri's questions - Part 4.

40.During the deliberations, did anyone bring up the similarity between the planned operation and the British action against the ship “Exodus 1947”, which ended in a political disaster for the British?

ANSWER: Maybe, maybe not. But if they did not, they must be suffering from a lack of long term memory.

41.Questions concerning the action itself: Why was the flotilla cut off from any contact with the world throughout the operation, if there was nothing to hide?

ANSWER: Well, why did they sink the USA ship "Liberty", though it was not the "Bismark"?

42.Did anyone protest that the soldiers were actually being sent into a trap?

ANSWER: Wait a minute. What trap are you talking about? They were sent to a ship in the international waters carrying foods to the people of Gaza, and manned by peaceful activists.

43.Was it taken into consideration that the plan adopted would place the soldiers for several critical minutes in a dangerously inferior position?

ANSWER: Israel is a firm believer in "If someone slap you on the right cheek, turn the left cheek to him". Have you not heard their argument "They attacked us", forgetting that they are the ones who attacked them in the middle of international waters?

44.When exactly did the soldiers start to shoot live ammunition?


ANSWER: Immediately. Believe it or not.

45.Which of the soldiers was the first to fire?


ANSWER: Does it matter? They were all there to carry out one task; shoot to kill.

46.Was the shooting – all or part of it – justified?


ANSWER: ditto. And how can it be all or part justified when they are the aggressor?

47.Is it true that the soldiers started firing even before descending onto the deck, as asserted by the passengers?

ANSWER: Yes it is. One of the activists was shoot in the middle of his head, meaning that the bullet came from the chopper, not from an eagle flying around, or a seagull throwing pebbles.

48.Is it true that the fire continued even after the captain of the ship and the activists announced several times over loudspeakers that the ship had surrendered, and after they had actually hoisted white flags?

ANSWER: Yes it is. And they shot people in the heads and faces at short distance.

49.Is it true that five of the nine people killed were shot in the back, indicating that they were trying to get away from the soldiers and thus could not be endangering their lives?

ANSWER: Absolutely true, though I don't know how many. But, doesn't this show that the Israelis are cowards as they shoot people in the back. Ain't that so.

50.Why was the killed man Ibrahim Bilgen, 61 years old and father of six and a candidate for mayor in his home town, described as a terrorist?

ANSWER: Remeber every one on the ship was intially labled as a terrorist. Remember that the soldiers carried on them lists with specific names. Maybe his name was on the list.

51.Why was the killed man Cetin Topcoglu, 54 years old, trainer of the Turkish national taekwondo (Korean martial arts) team, whose wife was also on the ship, described as a terrorist?

ANSWER: Maybe Israel does not have the stomach for "taekwondo", which is by the way Thai, not Korean",  but for "King Fu", which is chinese, or "Karate", which is Japanese.

52. Why was the killed man Cevdet Kiliclar, a 38 year old journalist, described as a terrorist?


ANSWER: To Israel, he is. Journalists blow the whistle.

53.Why was the killed man Ali Haydar Bengi, father of four, graduate of the al-Azhar school for literature in Cairo, described as a terrorist?

ANSWER: I am a graduate of Al-Azhar University; the second oldest still functioning university on the face of Earth. The first on is Al-kairowan University in Tunisia. And I carry the same Bachelor of Arts. My God, as per the Israeli criteria, I have categorized myself as a terrorist unknowingly. Damn, why on earth did you ask this question!

54.Why were the killed men Necdet Yaldirim, 32 years old, father of a daughter; Fahri Yaldiz, 43 years old, father of four; Cengiz Songur, 47 years old, father of seven; and Cengiz Akyuz, 41 years old, father of three, described as terrorists?


ANSWER: I give up. Please ask PM Netanyahu!

55.Is it a lie that the activists took a pistol from a soldier and shot him with it, as described by the IDF, or is it true that the activists did in fact throw the pistol into the sea without using it?

ANSWER: They always lie.

56.Is it true, as stated by Jamal Elshayyal, a British subject, that the soldiers prevented treatment for the Turkish wounded for three hours, during which time several of them died?

ANSWER: Definitely, though they were treated when some of them were injured on the ship. Isn't this "bite the hand that fed you".

57.Is it true, as stated by this journalist, that he was handcuffed behind his back and forced to kneel for three hours in the blazing sun, that he was not allowed to go and urinate and told to “piss in his pants”, that he remained handcuffed for 24 hours without water, that his British passport was taken from him and not returned; that his laptop computer, three cellular telephones and 1500 dollars in cash were taken from him and not returned?

ANSWER: Absolutely true. I have also read an article stating that in Thailand, unsatisfied Israel tourists move their bowls on the bed just before they checked out of the hotel.

58.Did the IDF cut off the passengers from the world for 48 hours and confiscate all the cameras, films and cell phones of the journalists on board in order to suppress any information that did not conform to the IDF story?

ANSWER: Yes they did.

59.Is it a standing procedure to keep the Prime Minister (or his acting deputy, Moshe Yaalon in this case) in the picture during an operation, was this procedure implemented, and was it implemented in previous cases, such as the Entebbe operation or the boarding of the ship “Karin A”?

ANSWER: They were all informed. It is a premeditated attack.

60.Questions concerning the behavior of the IDF Spokesman: IS it true that the IDF Spokesman spread a series of fabrications during the first few hours, in order to justify the action in the eyes of both the Israeli and the international public?

ANSWER: They always do that. Shower the media with false propaganda. Let them wonder, while in the meantime, they are gaining time for coming up with the biggest fabrication for the media.

61.Are the few minutes of film which have been shown hundreds of times on Israeli TV, from the first day on until now, a carefully edited clip, so that it is not seen what happened just before and just after?

ANSWER: Answer is implied in the question.

62.What is the truth of the assertion that the soldiers who were taken by the activists into the interior of the ship were about to be “lynched”, when the photos clearly show that they were surrounded for a considerable time by dozens of activists without being harmed, and that a doctor or medic from among the activists even treated them?

ANSWER: Imagine that!!!

63.What evidence is there for the assertion that the Turkish NGO called IHH has connections with al-Qaeda?

ANSWER: Nothing what soever. Al-Qaeda doesn't even exist, unless you mean the "Mujahedeen" who freed Afghanistan from the Russian occupation.

64.On what grounds was it stated again and again that it was a “terrorist organization”, though no evidence for this claim was offered?

ANSWER: Whatever Israel says goes. If they say they are terrorists, then you must believe them regardless of the ground on which their claim is based, be it sand or rocks.

65.Why was it asserted that the association was acting under the orders of Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, when in fact it is close to an opposition party?


ANSWER: Confusion tactic.

66.If it was in fact a terrorist organization known to the Israeli intelligence services, why was this not taken into account during the planning of the operation?

ANSWER: Israel is crazy about showing off. Don't the Jews run Hollywood in the states. It is show business.

67.Why did the Israeli government not announce this before the attack on the flotilla?


ANSWER: And miss a big fat chance of "Show Biz"! They have to intimidate the whole world.

68.Why were the words of one of the activists, who declared on his return that he wanted to be a “shahid”, translated by official propaganda in a manifestly dishonest manner, as if he had said that he wanted “to kill and be killed” (“shahid” means a person who sacrifices his life in order to testify to his belief in God, much like a Christian martyr)?


ANSWER: Zionist media always twist words like "Shaheed", "Mujahideen", "Sunni", "Fundamentalists", etc.

69.What is the source of the lie that the Turks called out “Go back to Auschwitz”?


ANSWER: Here it comes; the sword and the shield, the holocaust and antisemitism; the tow overused things they have been using for decades. Suppose it is true that the turks called that out, so what. The Jews said even worse about none-Jews.

70.Why were the Israeli doctors not called to inform the public at once about the character of the wounds of the injured soldiers, after it was announced that at least one of them was shot?


ANSWER: It boggles me. Jewish behavior and attitude, maybe.

71.Who invented the story that there were arms on the ship, and that they had been thrown into the sea?

ANSWER: Who do you expect? The Jews of course. And how convenient it is that they were thrown into the see. Did Israel have an  a life insurance policy on them?

72.Who invented the story that the activists had brought with them deadly weapons – when the exhibition organized by the IDF Spokesman himself showed nothing but tools found on any ship, including binoculars, a blood infusion instrument, knives and axes, as well as decorative Arab daggers and kitchen knives that are to be found on every ship, even one not equipped for 1000 passengers?

ANSWER: See who has the motive to invent such a story. Israel, of course, or maybe the vegetables seller shown below.

73.Do all these items – coupled with the endless repetition of the word “terrorists” and the blocking of any contrary information – not constitute brainwashing?

ANSWER: Finally, you are right on the money. I apologize. I was going to give up.

74.Questions concerning the inquiry: Why does the Israeli government refuse to take part in an international board of inquiry, composed of neutral personalities acceptable to them?


ANSWER: Because if they do, the Israel will get her ass exposed. Remember the goldstone's report abbout what Israel did to Gaza.

75.Why have the Prime Minister and the Minister of Defense announced that they are ready to testify - but not to answer questions?

ANSWER: They are using the "third amendment" right. It is obvious that if they let themselves be questioned, they will let themselves be incriminated.

76.Where does the argument come from that soldiers must not be called to testify – when in all previous investigations senior officers, junior officers and enlisted men were indeed subjected to questioning?

ANSWER: Not this time. Israel is in deep shit.

77.Why does the government refuse to appoint a State Commission of Inquiry under the Israeli law that was enacted by the Knesset in 1966 for this very purpose, especially in view of the fact that such commissions were appointed after the Yom Kippur war, after the Sabra and Shatila massacre, after the podium of the al-Aqsa Mosque was set on fire by an insane Australian, as well as to investigate corruption in sport and the murder of the Zionist leader Chaim Arlosoroff (some fifty years after it occurred!)?

ANSWER: That was in 1966. It is too old, and Israel really like to eat fresh vegetables.

78.Does the government have something to fear from such a commission, whose members are appointed by the President of the Supreme Court, and which is empowered to summon witnesses and cross-examine them, demand the production of documents and determine the personal responsibility for mistakes and crimes?

ANSWER: Oh, WOW! that is a biggie. Did I hear "cross-examine"? Are you serious?

79.Why was it decided in the end to appoint a pathetic committee, devoid of any legal powers, which will lack all credibility both in Israel and abroad?

ANSWER: It is a puppet show time.

And, finally, the question of questions: What is our political and military leadership trying to hide?

ANSWER: Everything.