Friday, May 3, 2013

PALESTINE/ISRAEL: Google de facto recognizes the state of Palestine



Google de facto recognizes the state of Palestine

 

The name 'Palestinian territories' was changed to 'Palestine' across all Google products; Israel's Foreign Ministry spokesman says Google shouldn't get involved in international politics.


By The Associated Press | May.03, 2013 | 9:03 PM





Google is de facto recognizing a state of Palestine - at least on its local home page in the Palestinian territories. 


Google spokesman Nathan Tyler said Friday "We're changing the name 'Palestinian territories' to 'Palestine' across our products." 


He said Google consults with a number of sources and authorities when naming countries and is following the lead of several international organizations. 


The move comes after a UN decision last year upgrading the Palestinians' status to "non-member observer state." 


Israel says Palestinian statehood should be reached through negotiations, not unilateral moves. 


Israeli foreign ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor said "Google is not a diplomatic entity which begs the question why are they getting involved in international politics and on the controversial side." 


UN spokesman Farhan Haq said the organization tended to refer to Palestinian areas on its maps as "the occupied Palestinian territories," but after the upgraded status, documents now refer to it as "Palestine." 


Google's domain for Palestinian territories www.google.ps now lists the location as "Palestine." 



Long Live, Palestine!



1 comment:

  1. "Palestinian areas on its maps as "the occupied Palestinian territories"

    The UN is a Zionist organization and dictatorship that officialised "Israel" as a state built on stolen Palestinian land.

    Who can trust the UN? Palestinians should never ever join the UN, a Bolshevik and NWO dictatorship responsible for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in Palestine!

    BAFS

    ReplyDelete

Say what is on your mind, but observe the rules of debate. No foul language is allowed, no matter how anger-evoking the posted article may be.

Thank you,

TruthSeeker