Foreign minister says past deals such as the Oslo accord will be
threatened by efforts towards UN recognition of Palestinian state
Catherine Ashton and Avigdor Lieberman prior to their meeting
in Jerusalem.
Photograph: Gali Tibbon/AFP/Getty Images
Israel will renounce past
agreements made with the Palestinians if they press ahead with unilateral plans
to seek recognition of a Palestinian state at the UN, foreign minister Avigdor
Lieberman has said.
"A move like that will be a violation of all the
agreements that were signed until today," Lieberman told the EU foreign
policy chief, Catherine Ashton, in Jerusalem.
"Israel
will no longer be committed to the agreements signed with the Palestinians in
the past 18 years."
The principal agreement referred to is the Oslo
accords, signed in September 1993, under which the Palestinian Authority (PA)
was created with responsibility for administering parts of the West Bank and Gaza.
Lieberman's comments further raise the stakes in the run up
to the UN general assembly in September, at which a majority of the 192
countries are expected to back a Palestinian state. Israel
and the US
are fiercely opposed to such a move and pressure is being applied to the
Palestinians to abandon their approach.
Ashton is visiting Jerusalem and the West Bank in an attempt
to break the impasse in negotiations between the two sides. Talks collapsed
last September after Israel
refused to extend a temporary and partial freeze on settlement construction.
In May Barack Obama publicly backed the creation of a
Palestinian state based on the pre-1967 borders, with agreed land swaps, as an
outcome of talks. The US
president's move angered the Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, who
wants to retain the large settlement blocks in the West
Bank. Obama's speech was intended to hold out the prospect of a
negotiated alternative to the Palestinians' unilateral plan.
The Israelis say they are ready to resume negotiations on
the basis of the Palestinians recognising Israel as a Jewish state. The
Palestinians reject this on the grounds it pre-empts talks on the right of
return of Palestinian refugees.
Lieberman, a hawkish member of the Israeli coalition
government, said on Friday: "In light of [PA President Mahmoud] Abbas's
current stance, the chances for negotiations are zero ... Israel is prepared to renew
negotiations. The ball is in the Palestinians' court."
Israel
has launched a global campaign through its embassies against the Palestinian
move to garner support for its state ahead of the UN meeting. It is
particularly worried about the position of European countries.
David Cameron indicated to Netanyahu in London
last month that Britain
might back a Palestinian state if there was no substantial progress in
negotiations.
Germany
and Italy
have said they will oppose the Palestinians' move. France's
position is thought to be similar to the UK's although it is trying to
broker a peace conference as an alternative.
The US
is expected to vote against the Palestinian move, and to use its veto in the UN
security council over a Palestinian application for membership of the UN. It is
applying pressure on Abbas and his officials to rethink their strategy.
However, Palestinian negotiator Muhammad Shtayeh told
journalists on Thursday that the Palestinian Authority would press ahead with
seeking recognition and membership of the UN regardless of whether talk resume.
"We are by all means going to the United Nations, whether
there are negotiations or no negotiations," he said. "We think that is
not either/or. We think that going to the United Nations and negotiations can
go hand in hand and they are complementary to each other."
Both the Palestinians and the Israelis were focusing on the
stance of European countries, he said. "For us and the Israelis the battle
is over Europe because the issue is not how
many states, the issue is also quality states, with all respect to
everybody," he said.
A spokesman for Ashton said: "It is more urgent than
ever to engage in meaningful negotiations and move the peace process forward
... What is needed is a clear reference framework to allow both sides to return
to the negotiating table."
Ashton had called for a new meeting of the Middle East quartet,
comprising the EU, US, Russia and the UN, to discuss the issues, he added.
If the Palestinian Authority was dismantled Israel would be
obliged under international law to assume full responsibility for the administration
of all the territory it has occupied since 1967.
Meanwhile the Turkish humanitarian organisation IHH has
announced it is pulling out of the flotilla of ships taking aid to Gaza later this month
after the Turkish authorities refused to give permission for the Mavi Marmara
to sail.
Nine Turkish activists were killed on board the Mavi Marmara
a year ago when Israeli commandos stormed on board in an attempt to prevent it
breaching Israel's sea
embargo around Gaza.
Other organisations participating in this year's flotilla
have said they will go ahead without the IHH.
A senior Israeli military official has said the navy will
stop the flotilla, using force if necessary.
Beware! This is what
satanic Israel has up her sleeve for the Palestinians



No comments:
Post a Comment
Say what is on your mind, but observe the rules of debate. No foul language is allowed, no matter how anger-evoking the posted article may be.
Thank you,
TruthSeeker