Media Falsifiers
by Paul Balles/Intifada Palestine
I am not blaming those who are resolved to rule, only those
who show an even greater readiness to submit. — Thucydides
Day
after day, TV anchor after anchor has been boasting “News from all angles, from
all points of view.”
There’s
never been such an open campaign to convince television viewers they aren’t
being brainwashed by the media’s restricted point of view.
In
what appears to be an attempt to outfox the Fox News Network, which has never
admitted the truth about their own political bias, the more liberal networks of
NBC, MSNBC, CBS, ABC and CNN now propagandize their viewers with outright lies.
Dozens
of liberal commentators, from MSNBC’s Chris Matthews to CNN’s Christiane
Amanpour, have been making a mantra out of “News from all angles, from all
points of view.”
When
a media spokesperson makes a claim like that, he or she should make sure of its
truth or refuse to repeat the falsehood.
Those
who have been misinforming their audiences are intelligent enough to know that
they are deceiving their viewers. Is it possible, for example, that any news
reporter would not know of the media’s anti-Islamic brainwashing?
How
can they continue to report on events like the Quran burning or the objections
to the planned Islamic centre in New
York without exposing the Islamaphobia? Where has the
Muslim angle or point of view in the news been?
The internet is full of examples of under-reported news. One
source of such stories is Project Censored who lists the Top Censored Stories
of 2011: 1. Global Plans to Replace the Dollar, 2. US Department of Defense is the
Worst Polluter on the Planet, 3. Internet Privacy and Personal Access at Risk, 4.
ICE Operates Secret Detention and Courts, 5. Blackwater (Xe): The Secret US War
in Pakistan, 6. Health Care Restrictions Cost Thousands of Lives in US, 7.
External Capitalist Forces Wreak Havoc in Africa, 8. Massacre in Peruvian
Amazon over US Free Trade Agreement, 9. Human Rights Abuses Continue in
Palestine, 10. US Funds and Supports the Taliban
Harvard Professor Stephen Walt reports that as early as
2005, 78 percent of the news media, 72 percent of military leaders and 69
percent of foreign affairs specialists believed that backing Israel seriously damages America’s image
around the world.
That
factual revelation isn’t something you hear on TV. If 78 percent of the news
media hold that belief, they are not reporting it.
Ex-Israeli
author and jazz musician Gilad Atzmon writes regular internet columns on the Middle East. He has zero respect for the mainstream
media, commenting: Our
independent websites and blogs are far more informative than the mainstream
media. Collectively, we provide a source of information that people can trust,
and we are rapidly becoming the main source of information.
Facebook,
Twitter, online blogs and websites with alternative news and commentary are
slowly making mainstream media obsolete.
Major
stories have been censored by the mainstream media. Often the censorship raises
questions about why an important story has been censored.
The
media has kept the fact that Obama has cut domestic spending while increasing
military spending under wraps. Much military spending is unjustifiable and
wasted.
Apart
from any conspiracy theories about 9/11, serious questions about discrepancies
in the official reports have been totally ignored by leading commentators.
Also
censored by the networks are health risks in personal products like cosmetics
and suntan lotion with nanotech particles.
Not
satisfied with manufacturing cover-ups, the networks have now resorted to
brainwashing viewers with lies about reporting the news from all angles and all
points of view.
____________________________________
Paul J. Balles is a retired American university
professor and freelance writer who has lived in the Middle
East for many years. He’s a weekly Op-Ed columnist for the Gulf
Daily News. Dr. Balles is also Editorial Consultant for Red House Marketing and
a regular contributor to Bahrain
This Month.


No comments:
Post a Comment
Say what is on your mind, but observe the rules of debate. No foul language is allowed, no matter how anger-evoking the posted article may be.
Thank you,
TruthSeeker