by Jeff Gates / Intifada
Palestine
War-making storylines tend to lose their steam. Sustained
warfare requires more than just a plausible Evil Doer. A credible narrative is
also essential. To remind us who to hate, who better than a murderous Nordic
Muslim-hater?
Far-fetched? How many Americans had heard of the Taliban
before March 2001 when destruction of the ancient Buddhas at Bamiyan was
reported worldwide as a ‘Cultural Holocaust’? Voila! An Evil Doer brand emerged
and was soon repackaged as Islamo-fascism.
Six months later, an attack on U.S. soil left little doubt that
outraged Americans would be provoked to war. Combine an emotionally wrenching
mass murder with manipulated intelligence and an invasion was assured—of Iraq. That
miscue required sophisticated pre-staging.
Residents of Washington,
DC well recall the sniper attacks
that left ten dead during the October 2002 lead-up to a Senate vote on a war
resolution sponsored by Jewish Zionist Senator Joe Lieberman. Those well-timed
murders ensured a heightened sense of insecurity and helped ratchet up the
requisite hatred—to invade a nation that played no role in 911.
Remember the Times Square Terrorist? A car belonging to a Muslim was found with two WalMart propane tanks, an alarm clock, a box of fireworks and some fertilizer. When? In May 2010 during the lead-up to a UN vote on a nuclear-free Middle East—opposed by Israel.
Remember the Times Square Terrorist? A car belonging to a Muslim was found with two WalMart propane tanks, an alarm clock, a box of fireworks and some fertilizer. When? In May 2010 during the lead-up to a UN vote on a nuclear-free Middle East—opposed by Israel.
To sustain hate requires a sustained stream of plausible
reasons to hate. Plus careful maintenance of a ‘generally accepted truth’ that
keeps attention focused on a credible threat.
Preparing the Minds
Islamo-phobia was a fresh threat when it first appeared in a
1993 article in Foreign Affairs. Yet it dates from 1990 when Princeton
Islamic scholar Bernard Lewis, an avid Zionist, touted “The Roots of Muslim
Rage.” By 1996, Harvard Professor Samuel Huntington was ready to publish The
Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order.
With more than 100 nongovernmental organizations promoting The
Clash, Americans experienced a seamless segue from an old narrative to a new.
Without missing a beat in Pentagon spending, we ended a global Cold War and, by
consensus, began a global War on Terrorism.
Huntington
argued that cultural and religious identities would emerge as the primary source of conflict.
To gain traction, The Clash consensus required a series of events that could be
plausibly blamed on Muslim Evil Doers. That was 15 years ago—a long time to
sustain a storyline.
With Osama bin Laden dead and war-weary Americans nearing
the tenth anniversary of 911, The narrative was losing its punch. Plus the
storytellers face a transparency problem: Intelligence agencies worldwide have
identified pro-Israelis as the common source of the manipulated intelligence
that induced the invasion of Iraq.
What’s a Zionist to do? Answer: look to past successes.
Timing is Everything
Ten days prior to 911, Tel Aviv announced a $1 million grant
to Israeli super-spy Jonathan Pollard. Why then? The timing suggests Tel Aviv
was signaling its operatives and sayanim (Hebrew for volunteers).
The Norwegian shooter is akin to the narrative-advancing
snipers who emerged in the lead-up to the Senate vote authorizing the U.S. military to invade Iraq. In the
lead-up to next month’s UN vote on statehood for Palestine,
the carnage in Norway
freshened up a stale storyline.
This latest mass murder was committed on the 65th
anniversary of the bombing of the King
David Hotel
in Tel Aviv. That mass murder was an operation of the Irgun, Zionist-terrorist
predecessors to the Likud Party of today’s Benjamin Netanyahu.
The same night that Israel launched its Six-Day War in
June 1967, Irgun operative Mathilde Krim was continuing her torrid affair with
President Lyndon Johnson—in the White House. Why then? Because that land grab
ensured the roots of the Muslim rage required to shape future events.
Why would a Norwegian Zionist target Norwegians? For the
same reason that Irgun Zionist Menachem Begin murdered Jews in the King David
Hotel: to advance a
narrative.
In September 2000, Likud Prime Minister Ariel Sharon led a
provocative march to Jerusalem’s Temple Mount.
When, after a year of calm, suicide bombings recommenced, Sharon and Netanyahu
warned that only when Americans “feel our pain” would we appreciate their
plight. To feel Israel’s
pain, they said, would require that America lose 4,500 to 5,000 to
terrorism, the initial estimate of those lives lost to a mass murder one year
later.
The well-timed operation in Norway turned to mass murder as a
means to remake the world order in plain sight. Those complicit specialize in
maintaining a storyline that dates from when the medieval Crusades pit
Christians against Muslims.
Absent the success of such deceit, we may forget whom to
hate.
_____________________________________
Jeff Gates: A widely acclaimed author, attorney, investment
banker, educator and consultant to government, corporate and union leaders
worldwide, Jeff Gates’ latest book is Guilt
By Association—How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War (2008) his
first release in the Criminal State series. His previous books include
Democracy at Risk: Rescuing Main Street From Wall Street and The Ownership
Solution: Toward a Shared Capitalism for the 21st Century. For two decades, an
adviser to policy-makers worldwide. Counsel to the U.S.
Senate Finance Committee (1980-87).Watch:the first Criminal
State documentary: A Closer Look at Israel’s Role in Terrorism
Visit his website:www.criminalstate.com. For those who may wish to have contact for book
distribution he can be reached at: jeffgates7@gmail.com and phoned in Arizona at 928-978-4568.
At Criminal
State, we specialize in explaining how. With that knowledge, readers can
sort out for themselves who and why. Many commentators start with the who and
why and then seek to cobble together a theory about how. Therein lies the
domain of conspiracy theorists. We don’t have a theory, just facts. You may
also want to review other op-eds written as “evergreens” — topical yet timeless:




No comments:
Post a Comment
Say what is on your mind, but observe the rules of debate. No foul language is allowed, no matter how anger-evoking the posted article may be.
Thank you,
TruthSeeker