Posted on November
28, 2011 by willyloman
by Scott Creighton
Do we have another
Cuban missile crisis taking shape? Do other recent developments point to the
winds of war and the gathering gloom? Russia Today
is confirming the earlier
reports that a Russian naval battle group is heading to Syrian waters.
There they will meet a U.S.
battle group already floating around off the coast of Syria.
Moscow is deploying war ships at its base in the
Syrian port of Tartus. The long-planned mission comes, providentially,
at the very moment when it could help prevent a potential conflict in the
strategically important Middle Eastern country.
The Russian battle
group will consist of three vessels led by the heavy aircraft-carrying missile
cruiser, Admiral Kuznetsov.
Russian military
officials insist that the move has no connection with the ongoing crisis in the
region and was planned a year ago, the Izvestia newspaper reports. Apart from Syria, the aircraft carrier and its escort ships
are set to visit the Lebanese capital, Beirut, Genoa in Italy
and Cyprus,
says the former Chief of Naval Staff, Admiral Viktor Kravchenko.
Nevertheless, he
added that the presence of a military force other than NATO’s is very useful
for this region, because “it will prevent the outbreak of an armed conflict,” Izvestia
quoted Kravchenko as saying.” Russia Today
Meanwhile it has
been reported the U.S.
warships are already anchored off the coast of Syria, running maneuvers for the
Orwellian named “Operation Enduring Freedom”
“Nuclear aircraft
carrier USS George HW Bush has reportedly anchored off Syria. As an
Arab League deadline to allow observers into the country passes with no
response from Damascus, the possibility of
intervention in Syria
seems to be growing.
The George H.W.
Bush Carrier Strike Group along with additional naval vessels are to remain in
the Mediterranean to conducting maritime security operations and support
missions as part of Operations Enduring Freedom and New Dawn.The US 6th Fleet
is also patrolling the area, Interfax news agency reports.
Meanwhile, America and Turkey
are urging their citizens to leave Syria” Russia Today
We came within a
hare’s breath of all out nuclear war back then. Some say the only thing that
prevented it was Cuba’s
determination to launch their nukes at the U.S. regardless of the terrible
outcome that surely would befall the country. Thus, there would be no profit in
the conflict if Cuba
was reduced to cinders. Kennedy was certainly more level headed that Obama is
by all accounts (Obama is known to rant and rave at people behind closed doors
and away from the cameras)
This brinksmanship
contest is moving to the next level. Obama and Clinton want another Libyan
style regime change at all costs in order to show their usefulness to the
financial elites who rule the world. I guess next year’s election isn’t quite
in the bag for the current administration just yet. If they can force Russia to back off and allow Syria to fall
to NATO “humanitarian” bombing campaigns, then they have proven their value to
the Global Free Market Wars.
But it doesn’t look
like Russia is ready to back
down just yet so the question becomes “just how far will Russia go to protect Syria from NATO bombs?”
The timing of all
of this couldn’t be more ominous. With the collapse of the Euro set to take
place and certain senators and the Obama administration looking to do away with
Posse Comitatus, one has to wonder if all out war is brewing in someone’s mind
in DC and the European Central Bank. This war would be extremely unpopular in
the states and we know that they have been working on certain agendas over the
past couple of years like putting troops on the ground here in America and
shutting down dissident sites on the internet, declaring their operators
“extremists” and “enemy belligerents”. Is it possible that someone is looking
to cover all their bases including a massive anti-war movement within the U.S.? And why
is it that 18 cities just recently risked serious blow-back by evicting the OWS
movements at just this time? It was a coordinated effort, some saying that the
Department of Homeland Security put it all together. Why the rush?


No comments:
Post a Comment
Say what is on your mind, but observe the rules of debate. No foul language is allowed, no matter how anger-evoking the posted article may be.
Thank you,
TruthSeeker