CORPORATES: Beyond Pretense

 

 The Global Free Market Wars Finally Acknowledged

 Scott Creighton

For years, I have been using the phrase "The Global Free Market Wars" to explain what is happening around the world. I didn't coin the phrase, I don't know who did, I wish I had. The pretense is coming to a end.  The Global War on Terror is and has been since it's inception, a fraud. A lie. 935 lies for Iraq; 1 Big Lie for Afghanistan (built on literally tons of smaller lies); NGO lies for Libya; a Fox News generated lie for Pakistan; a retroactive lie for Yemen; a lie of omission for Sudan; an opportunistic lie for North Korea; and finally, a string of lies for Iran.Iran was recently accused of 9/11 believe it or not. The judge in that ridiculous show trial (which was not even a trial and the defense had no presence in court) found in favor of some very small group of family members of victims of 9/11 to the tune of billions of dollars in damages. Take a look at the Iranian institutions listed as the defense in this case:

1. The Central bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran
2. The Iran Ministry of Commerce
3. The Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines
4. Iran Airlines
5. The National Iranian Gas Company
6. The National Iranian Petrochemical Company
7. The Iranian Ministry of Economic Affairs
8. The National Iranian Tanker Association
9. The National Iranian Oil Corporation
10. The Iranian Ministry of Petroleum
11. The Current Iranian Representative to the United Nations

What do you think these nationalized industries had to do with 9/11? What did the National Iranian Tanker Association have to do with 9/11? When the 9/11 Commission Report felt the need to deal with finding the funding of the actual attack, they stated that funding was of "little significance" so beyond the funding which these institutions had nothing to do with, they could not have possibly had ANYTHING at all to do with 9/11, yet there they are and the laughable ruling is on the books.

What is listed first? That's right, the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

A couple days ago on Sunday, the Secretary of Defense admitted that Iran was not seeking to make a nuclear weapon. No hemming no hawwing, just said it outright as a statement of fact.

Panetta says: “Are they [Iran] trying to develop a nuclear weapon? No.” Global Research

A NYT editorial makes it clear that the IAEA report never states that Iran has a military program of any kind associated with it's enrichment program.

"These words strongly suggest Iran is conducting a nuclear weapons program but it is noteworthy that nowhere does the IAEA come right out and say this. The agency stops short of making a clear conclusive statement." New York Times

 

All of which is supported by our own national intelligence agencies' consensus opinion; the Iranian nuclear program, if they actually existed then, has been halted since 2003.

"A government consultant who has read the highly classified 2011 N.I.E. update depicted the report as reinforcing the essential conclusion of the 2007 paper: Iran halted weaponization in 2003. “There’s more evidence to support that assessment,” the consultant told me." Seymour Hersh

In light of all the prevailing evidence, the IAEA report, the 2007 N.I.E. report, the 2011 N.I.E. update, and the statement from the former head of the CIA and current Secretary of Defense, it is easy to conclude the obvious; Iran is not developing nuclear weapons.

So what does globalist Hillary Clinton do? She tries to revive the old "the evidence is the fact that there is no evidence" doublethink.

"U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton's charge Tuesday that Iran had intended to keep the Fordow site secret until it was revealed by Western intelligence revived a claim the Barack Obama administration made in September 2009." Gareth Porter

This old war-mongering desperation chestnut was debunked years ago with the former head of the IAEA reported in his book that Iran had told them of the site 3 days prior to the U.S. informing them, thus showing that Iran had indeed lived up to their requirements under the non-proliferation agreement.

With Clinton's feeble attempt to finger Iran as the next great axis of evil threat to all mankind fizzling out like Umar Fizzlepant's diaper of doom, a new course of action had to be mapped out. They had tried to frame Iran for an assassination plot on U.S. soil that looks like it was written by the creators of Sponge Bob Square Pants. They sent a spy over to get a receipt for a half a million dollars from the Iranian intelligence agency and that ended up with him confessing before they sentenced him to death.

They tried everything, so now they are just going to try telling the truth and they are going to see if the people will just ignore it like they do everything else in this country just so long as "progressive" Obama provides sufficient left-cover for our collective crimes.

"The latest round of American sanctions are aimed at shutting down Iran's central bank, a senior US official said Thursday, spelling out that intention directly for the first time.

"We do mean to close down the Central Bank of Iran (CBI)," the official told reporters on condition of anonymity, while adding that the United States is moving quickly to implement the sanctions, signed into law last month." AFP

1. The central bank of Iran is state owned.
2. The central bank of Iraq WAS state owned. Now it is privatized.
3. The central bank of Afghanistan WAS state owned. Now it is privatized.
4. The central bank of Libya WAS state owned. Now it is privatized.
5. The central bank of Syria is state owned.
6. The central bank of North Korea is state owned.
7. The central bank of Venezuela is state owned.

Are we starting to see a pattern developing? Yes, to the leaders of the free world, it is evil to keep the masters of the universe from corrupting your economic system and locking your citizens into a life-long cycle of debt servitude. Looking out for the welfare of others who aren't super rich, is in fact, evil.

When those planes hit those buildings in 2001, the Global War on Terror took off and it was crucial that it had no boundaries, no specific limitations because, as in Yemen since then, the revolution that started threatened to nationalize their central bank once again, and that could not be allowed, thus al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula was formed and the "terrorists" had to be bombed by Obama's cruise missiles.

The Global Free Market Wars are out in the open. They have been for some time, just relegated by the MSM and the institutionalized masses to the realms of the conspiracy theorists and wing-nuts. We are pushing World War III so that bankers and financial houses can own and control more nations and their economies but that isn't anything new in the world of warcraft.

What is new, at least this time around, is their final admission that this is the point of it all; shut down nationalized central banking systems and replace them with our privatized model. Pure and simple. That is what it is.

When all else fails, tell them the truth and see if they give a shit. You can always count on the fact that they will forget.

willyloman

 

| January 13, 2012 at 8:05 am | Categories: Destabilization campaign Iran, disaster capitalism, Economic Crisis ie. Disaster Capitalism, economic terrorism, Fake Libyan Revolution, Fake Syrian Revolution, Global Free Market Wars, Globalization, Neoliberalizing Iran,Neoliberalizing Libya, Neoliberalizing Syria, Obama™, Protests in Yemen, Scott Creighton, Somalia, The So-Called PIIGS, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, War on Pakistan, war on the middle class, War on Yemen, war with Iran, Yemen, Yemen Protests