Obama Lawyer Claims they Can Murder U.S. “Belligerents”
Posted on February 24, 2012 by willyloman
by
Scott Creighton
1. Inclined or eager to fight; hostile or aggressive.
2. Of,
pertaining to, or
engaged in warfare.
These
adjectives mean having or showing an eagerness to fight. Belligerent refers to a tendency to hostile behavior: A belligerent reporter badgered the
politician.
The
Obama administration’s top Pentagon lawyer, the Defense Department general
counsel Jeh C. Johnson, said on Wednesday that the Obama administration has the
right to target and kill U.S. citizens deemed “belligerents” by the Obama
administration no matter what the location of the “belligerent” (outside or
inside the United States) without due process and that the courts have no jurisdiction
to intervene under any circumstances.
“Belligerents
who also happen to be U.S.
citizens do not enjoy immunity where non-citizen belligerents are valid
military objectives,” Jeh
C. Johnson
Since
when did someone who our White House decides has a “tendency” toward aggressive
behavior toward our occupation of foreign lands become a “valid military
objective”?
What
does that mean? It means that anyone who could pose a threat to our invasion
and occupation of sovereign nations can and will be killed. We used to call
these operations “black bag ops” or death squads. Now, with the advent of the
new left-cover president, we normalize the process, legitimizing outright state
sanctioned murder and death squads under the cover of Peace Prize Obama, the “Greatest
Man of Our Generation“
And
now his mouthpieces claim they can do it to anyone anywhere no matter what your
constitutional rights say. Remember the left-wing outcry back when the Bush
administration’s lawyers convoluted the law and claimed the right to detain, rendition,
and torture foreign “combatants” at will? Remember the dramatic beating of the
breasts and gnashing of the teeth of all those “progressives” when McCain and
Lieberman pushed the Enemy Belligerent Bill in 2010 and 2011? Where is
the moral outrage now? Seems to me all I hear coming out of the “progressive”
left is angst about how many women were on the panel hashing out insurance
coverage of contraceptives. I guess the party line towers in the democratic
party have bigger concerns about whether or not they get reimbursed for their
morning after pills than they do about “belligerents” down the block being
deemed a valid military objective. They’re only concerned with what directly
effects them.
How
quickly they forget.
First
they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out –
Because I was not a Socialist.
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then
they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out –
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then
they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out –
Because I was not a Jew.
Because I was not a Jew.
Then
they came for me — and there was no one left to speak for me. Martin
Niemoller
Joha, in the Arabic culture, is a character on which stories were spun; he, Joha, sometimes was smart, wise, and some other times stupid or funny, depending on the situation, political or whatever it may be, involving the people.
One day, a man came running to Joha and said, "Joha, fornication has become rampant in the eastern side of the village. Joha said, "I do not care. It is not in my side of the village"
A month later, the same man said to Joha, "Now fornication has hit your side of the village". Joha answered, "I do not care. It did nor hit the quarter in which I live"
A few weeks later, the same man said, "Now, Joha, fornication is in your quarter". Joha replied, "I do not care. It has not yet reached the street on which I live".
A week later, the man said to Joha, "Joha, fornication has completely comromised your stree". Joha said, "I do not care. My House is clean"
A few days later, the man told Joha that his house is no more clean. Joha told him that he did not care as long as his rear-end is untouched.
For how long Joha, or the American people, are going tostop being submissive before their personal rear-ends get abused by their government and politicians?! - The Blogger.


.jpg)

No comments:
Post a Comment
Say what is on your mind, but observe the rules of debate. No foul language is allowed, no matter how anger-evoking the posted article may be.
Thank you,
TruthSeeker