USA/ISRAEL/IRAN: Iran War Hysteria...

The Daily Dose (of Iran War Hysteria)

Today’s dose was administered by Charles S. Robb, a member of the rabidly Zionist wing of the Democrat Party and a former U.S. Senator from Virginia, and his partner, retired General Charles Wald. They write that the “U.S. military is capable of launching an effective surgical air strike against Iran’s nuclear program and its military installations.”

We surmise that “military installations” include supposed “commmand-and-control centers” that just happen to be in downtown Tehran. The golem of the rabbis is required to massacre as many recalcitrant Persians as possible, on whatever pretext. 

The senator and the general also advocate “enhancing Israel’s military capabilities -- by providing it with 200 advanced GBU-31 bunker-busting munitions and three KC-135 refueling tankers to extend the range of its jets...”

(Notice they can’t bring themselves to call the GBU-31s "bombs," they employ a euphemism: “munitions”).

The Republican Presidential primary season is an ideal time to bring the issue of America’s slavish service as Judaism’s golem in the Middle East to the national stage. If the Republican candidates campaigned in north Idaho we would try to ask them, on camera, “Mr. Romney-Santorum-Gingrich, why is a war-weary American nation with an exhausted economy obliged to fund or fight another foreign war, this time with Iran?”

A coruscating question like that embodies the ornery, independent-minded streak of the yeoman American, adept at ruffling the feathers of the crypto-rabbis of the Republican Right.

The Daily Dose (of Iran War Hysteria)

Today’s dose administered by: Newt Gingrich

On Wednesday, Feb. 8, Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich announced that an Iranian nuclear attack on America was an imminent danger and that it would kill and wound hundreds of thousands of Americans. Speaking to a cheering audience in Cleveland, Ohio, the former Speaker of the House of Representatives stated:  “You think about an Iranian nuclear weapon. You think about the dangers to Cleveland or Columbus or to Cincinnati or to New York. Remember what it felt like on 9/11 when 3,100 Americans were killed. Now imagine an attack where you add two zeros -- and it’s 300,000 dead, maybe a half-million wounded. This is a real danger. This is not science fiction.”

In today's reporting of Gingrich’s claims, the corporate media “forgot” to recall similar sinister war hype issued as a casus belli in connection with Saddam’s Iraq. On Sept. 8, 2002, on the front page of the New York Times, journalists Judith Miller and Michael Gordon claimed that Iraq was trying to build a nuclear bomb. They wrote that the first sign of this "smoking gun" would be a "mushroom cloud" over America.

Our troops have just exited Iraq, after almost nine years of combat. One would think that the media would engage in some sort of soul-searching retrospective that would impart to the taxpayers a lesson: the cost in human and economic terms of lies that lead us into war. 

But no, there has been almost none of that type of analysis. The media can’t afford to engage in it. Who do you think would come away discredited, besides the Federal government, as a result of such soul-searching? The government’s partner in crime, its mouthpiece media, who dare not remind us of the extent to which they accepted and processed the war-mongering claptrap that Gingrich, counting on our stupidity and amnesia, has the chutzpagh to recycle now with regard to Judaism's latest target, Iran.

When the New York Times, in today’s issue, mildly debunked Gingrich’s run-amok rhetoric, they restricted themselves to lobbing cream puff reservations about the improbability of Gingrich’s prognostication. An honest and responsible newspaper concerned about the costs to our nation in blood and treasure of yet another disastrous, fantasy-fueled Middle East war, would have had the courage and honor to follow the quotes from Gingrich with a reminder that the Times itself had engaged in similar nuclear war hyperbole, on its own front page, nearly ten years ago. Therefore, Americans ought to take the latest phantasmagoria from Gingrich with -- not a grain -- but a pound of salt, and perhaps, just perhaps, he should be laughed off the stage, rather than applauded.

 

No such luck. Newt’s Big Lie feeds the daily war hysteria which “our” Zionist media must disseminate to the American people if they are going to persuade us to acquiesce in the bombing of Iran back to the Stone Age, just as we reduced a once-proud Iraq to similar neolithic status. 

It’s never been about oil, folks, at least not as the top priority. The first concern is for any nation in the Middle East unwilling to be castrated and neutered by Zionist nuclear weapons and American taxpayer cash, to be flattened. Our Great Crusade in the Levant, stripped of its dopey cover story, is solely for the benefit of encouraging the devil’s Chosen Real Estate dealers to maintain their intransigent stranglehold over the Palestinians.

Is this foreign policy brain-dead and treasonous? You bet it is. Then why are we allowing it and voting for candidates who support it? Because Barnum was right.

 Thy should be admitted to

 for their insanity