Monday, May 21, 2012

MICHAEL HOFFMAN: Inter-related and not inter-related articles...

The Hoffman Wire
Ascension Thursday, 2012
The Ungodly Disobedience of the White Race

Dr. Edward J. Peterson, Jr. writes:  


This is one of the most important articles you have ever printed. Whites of child-bearing age seem to be oblivious to this demographic catastrophy or else do not care. It is normal parlance among them to speak of having two or less children. They speak of the murder of their children in sanitized terms such as "terminating an unwanted pregnancy" -- which would interfere with their career. 

They have been re-educated into believing that this manner of behavior is normal and indeed morally right. And they have been abetted by the so-called Christian churches, especially mainstream protestants and the new conciliar Roman religion.

Thank you,
--Edward J. Peterson, Jr., M.D., D.D., CADC

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Thank you, Dr. Peterson, for these trenchant observations.

We have two groups of laws operant on earth: God's Law and the Natural Law written on the hearts and consciences even of pagan nations.

According to God's Law, His people will not charge one another interest on loans of money (usury) -- and no, the divine law does not refer to exorbitant interest, but all interest - (sorry no Talmudic loopholes here).

This was the universal law of the Gospel, unanimously upheld by the Fathers, councils, popes, and the Church as a whole for fifteen hundred years. Because usury is unnatural (even a pagan like Aristotle knew that), deriving profit from a medium of exchange is an exercise in sterility, not fecundity. I will not debate these controversial issues here. If I ever obtain the funds to finish my book on usury, these points will be amply documented.

For the present, permit me to restate what was known and honored in our civilization for fifteen centuries, from the sterility of interest on money the sterility of families will inevitably follow.

Now to the Natural Law: I often have "neo-pagans," agnostics and atheists who are critical of Christ and Christianity write to ask why I don't drop the allegiance to Christianity which is just "another hoax" among so many others. With the atheists and agnostics I refer them to Fr. Robert Spitzer's superb work, New Proofs for the Existence of God: Contributions of Contemporary Physics and Philosophy.

To the "neo-pagans" who are often the most deeply implicated in abortion and birth control, I try to remind them about the Natural Law as it existed among the old pagans for thousands of years, and in some intact cultures, is still extant today. 1. All of the old paganism save for the Hecate/Kali witch cults, were one immense magical working toward the objective of the most prized of all treasures: fertility. 2. If one travels to pagan cultures that are intact today, such as in Africa or Nepal, the woman who has had the most children is considered a beacon of good luck and the most erotic woman in the village. People want to touch her, be good to her and receive her blessing. Men chase after her because her fertility is for them the most erotic aspect of her whole persona as a woman.

Even the tattooed cannibals of old knew what today's radical feminists and liberal "Christians" do not. We have a child-fearing culture in the white West. Among the Right wing this is doubly farcical since they propose to "restore America" to the principles and culture of the Founders. But the typical Founder was usually not an only-child. These geniuses were born because their parents had the faith in God to have as many children as He deigned by His will to send unto this planet through them. When Jack Larkin, the historian of the early American Republic set out to write one of his first overviews of Americans in that era, he titled it, Children Everywhere. Today we think we're going to restore America without God. Oh, yes, we'll invoke His name but we won't submit to His will. We won't let Him use us to have all the children He wants incarnated on earth, according to his divine plan. Like usury, this act of disobedience is a root cause of our current defeat, but most of our fellow Americans are not interested in root causes, but in symptoms. They are doomed to more defeat and catastrophe.

Earlier this morning we sent out a The Hoffman Wire dispatch about the historic demographic decline of the white race and linked it to a curse by white people who are choosing to go extinct by contracepting and aborting themselves out of existence. That Hoffman Wire was received by White Nationalists who operate blogs and e-mail bulletins. Not one of them has reprinted it. Yet they will expend reams of paper and miles of blog and e-mail space discoursing on the latest Muslim invasions of Europe, Mexican invasions of North America, and on "white" ideology, philosophy and ethics - endless intellectualizing that is conspicuously devoid of discussion of the imperative power politics of large white families. This is out of madhouse. Yet these folks head the "white movement" and lead it off the demographic cliff. How have these sterile persons managed to gain these leadership positions and maroon their own movement? 

Those who disobey God's Law - and even the Natural Law - are not going to be among the nations that predominate in the second half of the 21st century -- not when half the people in Pakistan and Egypt are under the age of 16. Not when Mexican fertility exceeds white American fertility. I've got a bulletin for you: all those foreign people deserve to surpass the white race to whom God has given so much and who, collectively, continue to anger Him with their ungodly refusal to serve as the vessels for His children to manifest on earth.

--Michael Hoffman


The Hoffman Wire
 
GOD IS NOT MOCKED

An accursed people are defined as those who, contrary to God's will, are contracepting and aborting themselves out of existence

How many children do you have, Mr. and Mrs. White Nationalist?

"If the U.S. depended on white births alone, we’d be dead." -- Dowell Myers, Professor of Demography, University of Southern California
_________________________________________

Whites now account for under half of the births in the U.S.

By Sabrina Tavernese | New York Times | May 17, 2012

WASHINGTON — After years of speculation, estimates and projections, the Census Bureau has made it official: White births are no longer a majority in the United States.

Non-Hispanic whites accounted for 49.6 percent of all births in the 12-month period that ended last July, according to Census Bureau data made public on Thursday, while minorities — including Hispanics, blacks, Asians and those of mixed race — reached 50.4 percent, representing a majority for the first time in the country’s history.

Such a turn has been long expected, but no one was certain when the moment would arrive — signaling a milestone for a nation whose government was founded by white Europeans and has wrestled mightily with issues of race, from the days of slavery, through a civil war, bitter civil rights battles and, most recently, highly charged debates over efforts to restrict immigration.

While over all, whites will remain a majority for some time, the fact that a younger generation is being born in which minorities are the majority has broad implications for the country’s economy, its political life and its identity. “This is an important tipping point,” said William H. Frey, the senior demographer at the Brookings Institution, describing the shift as a “transformation from a mostly white baby boomer culture to the more globalized multiethnic country that we are becoming.”

Signs that the country is evolving this way start with the Oval Office, and have swept hundreds of counties in recent years, with 348 in which whites are no longer in the majority. That number doubles when it comes to the toddler population, Mr. Frey said. Whites are no longer the majority in four states and the District of Columbia, and have slipped below half in many major metro areas, including New York, Las Vegas and Memphis. A more diverse young population forms the basis of a generational divide with the country’s elderly, a group that is largely white and grew up in a world that was too.

The contrast raises important policy questions. The United States has a spotty record educating minority youth; will older Americans balk at paying to educate a younger generation that looks less like themselves? And while the increasingly diverse young population is a potential engine of growth, will it become a burden if it is not properly educated? 

“The question is, how do we reimagine the social contract when the generations don’t look like one another?” said Marcelo Suarez-Orozco, co-director of Immigration studies at New York University.

The trend toward greater minority births has been building for years, the result of the large wave of immigration here over the past three decades. Hispanics make up the majority of immigrants, and they tend to be younger — and to have more children — than non-Hispanic whites. (Of the total births in the year that ended last July, about 26 percent were Hispanic, about 15 percent black, and about 4 percent Asian.)

Whites still represent the single largest share of all births, at 49.6 percent, and are an overwhelming majority in the population as a whole, at 63.4 percent. But they are aging, causing a tectonic shift in American demographics. The median age for non-Hispanic whites is 42 — meaning the bulk of women are moving out of their prime childbearing years.

Latinos, on the other hand, are squarely within their peak fertility, with a median age of 27, said Jeffrey Passel, senior demographer at the Pew Hispanic Center. Between 2000 and 2010, there were more Hispanic births in the United States than there were arriving Hispanic immigrants, he said.

The result is striking: Minorities accounted for 92 percent of the nation’s population growth in the decade that ended in 2010, Mr. Frey calculated, a surge that has created a very different looking America from the one of the 1950s, when the TV characters Ozzie and Harriet were a national archetype.

The change is playing out across states with large differences in ethnic and racial makeup between the elderly and the young. Some of the largest gaps are in Arizona, Nevada, Texas and California, states that have had flare-ups over immigration, school textbooks and priorities in spending. The nonrural county with the largest gap is Yuma County, Ariz., where just 18 percent of people under 20 are white, compared with 73 percent of people over 65, Mr. Frey said.

Perhaps the most urgent aspect of the change is education. A college degree has become the most important building block of success in today’s economy, but blacks and Latinos lag far behind whites in getting one. According to Mr. Frey, just 13 percent of Hispanics and 18 percent of blacks have a college degree, compared with 31 percent of whites.

Those stark statistics are made more troubling by the fact that young Americans will soon be faced with caring for the bulging population of baby boomers as they age into retirement, said William O’Hare, a senior consultant to the Annie E. Casey Foundation in Baltimore, on top of inheriting trillions of dollars of government debt.

“The forces coming together here are very clear, but I don’t see our political leaders putting them together in any coherent way,” he said, adding that educating young minorities was of critical importance to the future of the country and the economy.

Immigrants took several generations to assimilate through education in the last large wave of immigration at the turn of the 20th century, Mr. Suarez-Orozco said, but mobility was less dependent on education then, and Americans today cannot afford to wait, as they struggle to compete with countries like China.

“This is a polite knock on the door to tell us to get ready,” said Ruy Teixeira, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. “We do a pretty lousy job of educating the younger generation of minorities. Basically, we are not ready for this.”

But there are bright spots. Arturo Vargas, executive director of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials, said the immigration debate of recent years has raised the political consciousness of young Latinos and he is hopeful that more will become politically active as a result. Only half of eligible Latino voters cast ballots in 2008, he said, compared with 65 percent of eligible non-Hispanic voters. “We have an opportunity here with this current generation,” Mr. Vargas said. About 50,000 Latinos turn 18 every month, he said.

And the fact that the country is getting a burst of births from nonwhites is a huge advantage, argues Dowell Myers, professor of policy, planning and demography at the University of Southern California. European societies with low levels of immigration now have young populations that are too small to support larger aging ones, exacerbating problems with the economy.

“If the U.S. depended on white births alone, we’d be dead,” Mr. Myers said. “Without the contributions from all these other groups, we would become too top-heavy with old people.”


 ----------------------------------------
 Blogger Comment: The same trend has not stricken the Christian society only, but also the Muslim society in the Middle East even though their holy book, the Qur'aan", forbids them of killing children (abortion) for fear of poverty, unless there is a medical reason for such an abortion (mother's life is at risk). The Qura'an says: "Do not kill them (children) for fear of poverty. WE support them as well as WE do support you"/my translation. "support them" is mentioned before "support you"; a feature of the Arabic language; precedence, emphasizing that it is God who supports everybody. so fear not of not being able to support your children.

In fact, people have become so bound by materialism and calculate
their lives on materialistic bases unaware that according to the natural laws of materialism itself, materialism perishes; forgetting that spirituality and belief last forever.

TruthSeeker 

___________________________

A smile of fear!!




3 comments:

  1. Although I do not approve of abortion except under special circumstances, I do disagree that God looks after all Muslim children.

    All one has to do is look at the children of war in those nations. Not to mention the high number in heavily bombed countries of malformed infants being born with nothing ahead of them but lives of severe pain.

    Were I a pregnant woman, say of Fallujah, I would seriously consider other options should medical investigation show that I was to birth such a child.

    Wrong? Perhaps. I am not talking missing a few limbs or webbed fingers and toes, I am speaking of the hideous deformities we see... Had I other children to care for who were healthy, I would put their interests first.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Although I do not approve of abortion except under special circumstances, I do disagree that God looks after all Muslim children.

    All one has to do is look at the children of war in those nations. Not to mention the high number in heavily bombed countries of malformed infants being born with nothing ahead of them but lives of severe pain.

    Were I a pregnant woman, say of Fallujah, I would seriously consider other options should medical investigation show that I was to birth such a child.

    Wrong? Perhaps. I am not talking missing a few limbs or webbed fingers and toes, I am speaking of the hideous deformities we see... Had I other children to care for who were healthy, I would put their interests first.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nour, long time no see.

    "I do disagree that God looks after all Muslim children" - You said.

    And allow me to add: "...all Christian, Jewish, Hindus, Buddhist, etc. or children of any nations either" WWW I WWW II, Vietnam, Korea, Bosnia, Sudan, Angola, Iraq, and in ancient times...Alexander the great, Genghis Khan, the Crusaders, etc". The human race is the most pathetic race in the cosmos, assuming that there are other races.

    "Were I a pregnant woman, say of Fallujah, I would seriously consider other options should medical investigation show that I was to birth such a child." - You said.

    You are absolutely right, and in testimony, here I affix my stamp and my ten finger prints thereupon.

    ReplyDelete

Say what is on your mind, but observe the rules of debate. No foul language is allowed, no matter how anger-evoking the posted article may be.

Thank you,

TruthSeeker