A seemingly coordinated wave of condemnations arrived as soon as the Prime Minister promised settlers 851 new housing units in the West Bank.
By
Barak Ravid
| Jun.08,
2012 | 10:03 PM
As
part of his attempts to press Likud ministers to vote against a bill geared at
sanctioning West Bank settlements, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stressed
the possible diplomatic
backlash Israel
could suffer is the legislation passed.
While
Netanyahu managed to stop the bill, the compensation he offered settlers, in
the form of 851
new West Bank housing units has triggered a wave of recent and severe
condemnations.
Following
the U.S. administrations
initial condemnation, a seemingly coordinated wave of statements arrived, with Germany, Britain,
France, and the European
Union's Foreign Minister Catherine Ashton holding Israel responsible for the
standstill in talks with the Palestinians.
U.K.
Foreign Secretary William Hague was possibly the most harsh, saying that London
we appreciated "the Israeli Government’s efforts to avoid damaging
legislation in the Israeli Knesset by voting against a bill to legalize West
Bank outposts, the decision to move settlers from an illegal outpost by
creating housing units in settlements elsewhere across the Green Line sets a
dangerous precedent."
"Such
outposts are illegal under both Israeli and international law and should be
removed entirely," Hague added, saying that settlement construction was a
violation of international law, hindered peace efforts, and should be stopped
immediately.
"Continued
systematic settlement activity, and repeated breaches by the Israeli Government
of international law, is provocative, undermines the prospects of peace between
Israel
and the Palestinians, and makes the two state solution ever harder to realize.
It makes it increasingly difficult for Israel’s international friends to
defend the Israeli Government's actions," he added.
Hague's
statement as the German Foreign Ministry released a response of its own, saying
that the "German government is very concerned about the Israeli
announcement to build 851 new housing units in Israeli settlements in the West Bank. The eviction or relocation of outposts -- as
it has been announced in the past few days -- does not legitimize an increase
in settlement construction elsewhere."
French
officials sounded a similar message, with French foreign ministry spokesman
Bernard Valero saying in a statement that Paris reaffirms "that settlement
activity is illegal under international law, undermines, on the ground, the
foundations of the two-State solution and constitutes an obstacle to peace,"
said in a statement."
Ashton's
statement joined the previous three, even calling Netanyahu to retract his
statement concerning the 851 new West Bank
homes.
“Settlements
are illegal under international law and threaten to make a two-state solution
impossible. The EU Representative called on the Israeli Government to “exercise
the highest sense of responsibility by reversing these decisions to demonstrate
its commitment toward the peace process, in full respect of international law,”
a statement from Ashton's office said.
It
seems that Netanyahu can endure the condemnations from the U.S. and Europe,
representing a international backlash much smaller than he would have
experienced if the outpost sanctioning bill would have passed.
However,
the harsh condemnations show the great frustration and anger among Israel's
European allies over increased settlement activity. More and more EU states are
facing heavy public pressure to take steps against it, such as marking products
made in the settlements or banning them altogether.
Thus
far, most EU governments aren't doing anything about it, with the exception of Britain, Ireland,
and Denmark,
who are all weighing measures on the matter.
But
the trend is clear: as long as the diplomatic standstill lasts and settlement
activity continues the threat of a European ban on settlement products and
Israeli products increases from theory to tangible reality.
Settlers at the start of
a three-day march from Ulpana to Jerusalem,
June 4, 2012

No comments:
Post a Comment
Say what is on your mind, but observe the rules of debate. No foul language is allowed, no matter how anger-evoking the posted article may be.
Thank you,
TruthSeeker