Ben
Caspit for Al-Monitor
Secret
Abbas-Netanyahu envoy speaks out
At
the end of August, about 10 days before the Jewish New Year, Palestinian
President Mahmoud Abbas asked his people to put him in contact with an Israeli
political personage with whom he is closely acquainted. He had served as
Knesset member and minister in numerous Israeli governments, had recently
resigned from politics, is well-connected with the top political brass and
is closely familiar with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Abbas asked the man
to visit the Palestinian Authority headquarters in Ramallah. The man
willingly agreed. Several days later, they met; it was around a week before the
end of the Hebrew year.
In
private discussions after the tête-à-tête, speaking on condition
of anonymity, the Israeli intermediary described Abbas as an
isolated, gloomy, despairing leader who is counting the days and
begging for help. He is considering resigning from his post, to “call
the Israeli General Head of Command and give him the keys to the West Bank.” Abbas is not capable of giving hope to his
people, and he reports “total disconnection from the Israelis,"
saying, "They are making fools out of us. I can’t do a thing
without Israel’s
approval. Everything is stuck. No negotiations, agreements aren’t
implemented. I have no choice left.”
The
intermediary tried to encourage him and talk him out of his bad spirits.
He begged Abbas not to resign. “It will cause all the other people who still
believe in the peace process to despair,” he told him. “Also, there’s no one to replace you. A catastrophe can happen if
you quit.” And then Abbas reportedly told him, “I want to make peace.
I know that the Israelis don’t believe me, but I really do want it. I know that
if I do it, my fate could be like that of [Egyptian President Anwar] Sadat and
[Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak] Rabin, but I don’t care.”
Abbas
asked him to carry this message to Netanyahu. The Israeli intermediary
willingly agreed. The very next day, he sat across from Netanyahu in Jerusalem and made
his report. “The situation is dangerous,” he told the prime minister. “It leads
us nowhere. [Abbas] is desperate. There might be an explosion. What, do
you really want to run the West Bank on your
own?” he asked Netanyahu. In the course of the conversation, the
Israeli raised a proposition. “Let’s organize a secret meeting between the
two of you, in my house. No one will know about it. Now, immediately, within
the next two days, even before Rosh Hashana. What do you say?”
To
his surprise, Netanyahu thought for a few seconds and then agreed. “No problem.
If he comes, I’ll come.” In essence, the Israeli intermediary had proposed to
set up a secret channel between Netanyahu and Abbas.
“Official, media-covered meetings now can only cause damage,” he said.
“You two have to sit alone behind closed doors and break the ice.”
Netanyahu agreed.
The
Israeli returned home and tried to make contact with Abbas, but was unable
to reach him. The Palestinian president's assistants screened his calls, saying
he was busy at meetings and would get back to him after the
holiday. The intermediary insisted that it was urgent, that he had an
important message, but his efforts bore no fruit. He understood that something
had happened on the other side.
After
a short time, Abbas flew to Paris
on Sept. 21. There, he met with four retired Israeli ambassadors who had served in
France.
The meeting was covered by the Israeli media, which reported that Abbas had
said he was willing to meet with Netanyahu, but a “third party” had blocked the meeting. After a few days, it
emerged that Abbas had been referring to the Americans. According to Abbas,
Secretary of State John Kerry felt that an unplanned meeting between Abbas and
Netanyahu might not go well and could cause damage and prompt an explosion.
State Department spokesman John Kirby, however, said the details “were
not accurate.” One way or the other, the meeting never got off the ground.
“That
was a terrible mistake,” the Israeli told Al-Monitor this week. “Such a
meeting would not have caused an explosion; on the contrary, it would have
prevented it. If we were talking about an official, media-covered talk, then
perhaps the Americans would have been right. But the meeting that was supposed
to have been held in my home was not that kind of forum. It would have
remained secret; it would not have caused damage to either side and would
have helped to break the ice between them. I am sorry that the Americans didn’t
understand that.”
Now
all that is left for both sides is to pick up the pieces. In recent weeks,
ever since the eruption of the terror wave nicknamed by some the “knife
intifada,” Netanyahu has turned Abbas into a punching bag. Of course, it must
be noted that the Palestinian president only got what was coming to him.
His incendiary statements approving the recent terror
attacks are inflaming the atmosphere in Israel. The PA media outlets
continue the incitement and stoke the rumors regarding Israeli intentions
to change the status quo on the Temple
Mount. And an official
statement from Fatah this week elucidated that the “occupation” also
refers to the territories conquered before the Six Day War in 1967. Such
a statement negates the very existence of the State of Israel that was
established in 1948, and in effect views all its land as “occupied territory.”
Netanyahu,
who isn't one to shrink from a fight, caused a ruckus Oct. 20 in the
speech he delivered to the Zionist Congress in Jerusalem. Netanyahu noted that at the
outset, Adolf Hitler actually hadn't wanted to exterminate the
Jews, but only to expel them. According to the prime minister, Jerusalem
Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler in November 1941 and said,
“If you expel them, they'll all come here [to Palestine].” Hitler then asked, "What
should I do with them?" and the mufti replied, "Burn them."
That’s
Netanyahu’s story. The storm erupted almost immediately. In effect, Netanyahu
made the Palestinians out to be worse than the Nazis in his claim that they
convinced Hitler to carry out the Holocaust. The heads of the Israeli
opposition, who have given Netanyahu a certain amount of backup and free rein
since the eruption of the terror wave, furiously fell upon him. Meretz
Chairwoman Zehava Gal-On outdid herself when she noted that the
massacre in Babi Yar, in which more than
33,000 Jews were murdered, took place months before the meeting between Hitler
and the mufti. Also, she said, 200,000 Jews in Lithuania, including many of
Netanyahu’s relatives, were murdered before this meeting.
Netanyahu’s
words are stirring the academic world as well. Historians, Holocaust scholars
and experts are united in their opinion that the prime minister’s allegations
have no connection to reality. The “Final Solution” unofficially began even
before Hitler and Husseini met, as evident in the numerous acts of slaughter
perpetrated before the meeting.
The
chaotic reality of the Middle East has its own brand of dark humor: On the day
after Netanyahu’s tempestuous words, his timetable dictated an official state
meeting in Berlin
with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. He is arriving there as someone who
portrayed Hitler as someone who "didn’t want to kill the
Jews," and instead blames the Palestinians for the Holocaust of
European Jewry.
In
Netanyahu’s current state of mind, the ends justify the means. Thus he allows
himself to say anything to achieve his goal of passing the buck of
responsibility for the current situation from himself to Abbas. As far
as Netanyahu is concerned, all is fair in love and war, and so he allows
himself to distort and rewrite history, including its most appalling
chapters.
An
Israeli envoy has revealed that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had agreed to
meet secretly with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.
What drove one young Israeli Bedouin man to attack?
Shlomi Eldar for Al-Monitor
Shlomi Eldar for Al-Monitor
Israeli Arabs' red line
Mazal Mualem for Al-Monitor
Mazal Mualem for Al-Monitor
Why does Hamas want a third intifada?
Hazem Balousha for Al-Monitor
Hazem Balousha for Al-Monitor
Gazans find money in rubble of destroyed houses
Rasha Abou Jalal for Al-Monitor
Rasha Abou Jalal for Al-Monitor
Long live Palestine!


No comments:
Post a Comment
Say what is on your mind, but observe the rules of debate. No foul language is allowed, no matter how anger-evoking the posted article may be.
Thank you,
TruthSeeker