USA/SYRIA: The game is a foot

Obama Considers Using US Soldiers as Human Shields to Protect CIA’s Terrorists in Syria 

Posted on October 27, 2015 by willyloma 
by Scott Creighton

Unfuckingbelievable!

The depths to which these people will descend down the sewers of deep-state politics in order to secure their regime change operation in Syria is breath-taking sometimes. It really is. Now that Russia is launching successful airstrikes against both “ISIS” and the CIA’s moderate terrorists in Syria and the Syrian army is making serious headway in driving these mercenary Wahhabist terrorists from their nation, TPTB and their puppet Obama are getting desperate.

Because of the Russians getting involved, there are considerably fewer terrorists destabilizing Syria on behalf of Western Big Business (and a shitload of billionaires)

I imagine it’s a much harder sell to those Wahhabists in Jordan and Saudi Arabia: trying to get them to go up against Russian forces as opposed to Syrian ones. The paycheck from our Peace Prize President is only good if you live long enough to cash it.

With that in mind, our left-cover White House administration is desperate not to be out-manuvered by the Russians and Putin himself.

So, what do they come up with: … using US soldiers as human shields by embedding them with the CIA’s al Qaeda-linked terrorists such as al Nusra and other factions of the so-called “Free Syrian Army”

You got to be shitting me…

President Obama’s most senior national security advisers have recommended measures that would move U.S. troops closer to the front lines in Iraq and Syria, officials said…

The debate over the proposed steps, which would for the first time position a limited number of Special Operations forces on the ground in Syria and put U.S. advisers closer to the firefights in Iraq…

Senior U.S. officials, however, warned that such measures had the potential to put the United States in direct conflict with the Syrian regime and the Russian and Iranian forces backing it. Washington Post

The Washington Post article states they wont put them in Syria and Iraq to be involved in direct conflict, and I guess that means they will just station them close enough to our destabilization terrorists to be hit by Russian cruise missiles and airstrikes if they continue.

Essentially, that makes US soldiers human shields for the CIA’s terrorists in two countries.

The move is based, according to officials, on the “fact” that the conflict has stagnated and something must be done to shake things up.

The recommendations came at Obama’s request and reflect the president’s and his top advisers’ concern that the battle in Iraq and Syria is largely stalemated and in need of new ideas to generate momentum against Islamic State forces. Washington Post

That is total bullshit. Everyone knows the terrorists in Syria and Iraq both are on the run. The only thing that is stagnating is the CIA’s terrorist recruitment drive.

They are losing in this effort and what is needed is a major crisis to shake things up… either that or a motivating factor which keeps Russia from targeting the CIA’s terrorists.

That is exactly what this move will be about if President Obama agrees to it.

The article from the Washington Post is clearly an attempt to gauge public opinion and see what the level of public outrage is generated by it.

The Syrian government has requested help from the Russians to deal with the “moderate” destabilization terrorists our CIA has installed in their country.

The Iraqi government is doing the same as are the Afghanis.

The Russians and the Syrians will not hesitate to fire on these terrorist targets even if they are shielded by President Obama’s own troops. If that happens and a US soldier is killed, clearly the administration hopes they can use that event to oust Russia from the Security Council so they can pass a vote allowing them to regime change Syria in earnest.

That’s a risky gamble at best.

And God forbid, US forces target Russian planes in Syria or Iraq as it is my guess that Putin would not hesitate to target and destroy US military installations in both Iraq and Afghanistan as a result. And if nothing else, that will be his default position in any future talks with the US if and when President Peace Prize decides to use US troops as human shields to protect terrorists in Syria with links to the group that supposedly attacked us on 9/11.

How desperate and disgusting these people are. Hopefully if he does do this, it will show our military service members what our leaders really think of them and perhaps another Foxtrot Tango Alpha movement will follow. One’s got to be brewing by now anyway.

 ***

Oct 27 2015, 7:38 pm ET
Ashton Carter: U.S. to Begin 'Direct Action on the Ground' in Iraq, Syria
by Jim Miklaszewski and Courtney Kube

Defense Secretary Ashton Carter said Tuesday that the U.S. will begin "direct action on the ground" against ISIS forces in Iraq and Syria, aiming to intensify pressure on the militants as progress against them remains elusive.

"We won't hold back from supporting capable partners in opportunistic attacks against ISIL, or conducting such missions directly whether by strikes from the air or direct action on the ground," Carter said in testimony before the Senate Armed Services committee, using an alternative name for the militant group.

Carter pointed to last week's rescue operation with Kurdish forces in northern Iraq to free hostages held by ISIS.

Related: Master Sgt. Joshua Wheeler, U.S. Commando Killed in ISIS Raid, Ran to Gunfight

Carter and Pentagon officials initially refused to characterize the rescue operation as U.S. boots on the ground. However, Carter said last week that the military expects "more raids of this kind" and that the rescue mission "represents a continuation of our advise and assist mission."

This may mean some American soldiers "will be in harm's way, no question about it," Carter said last week.

After months of denying that U.S. troops would be in any combat role in Iraq, Carter late last week in a response to a question posed by NBC News, also acknowledged that the situation U.S. soldiers found themselves in during the raid in Hawija was combat.

"This is combat and things are complicated," Carter said.

During Tuesday's Senate hearing, Carter said Wheeler "was killed in combat."

White House deputy press secretary Eric Schultz on Tuesday said the administration has "no intention of long term ground combat". He added that U.S. forces will continue to robustly train, advise and assist.

A feisty Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, said on Tuesday in the Senate Armed Services committee hearing that the U.S. effort in Syria is a "half-assed strategy at best," and said that the U.S. is not doing a "damn thing" to bring down Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime.

Carter on Tuesday pushed back against that notion.

Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, acknowledged that the "balance of forces" has tilted in Assad's favor.