13.Why has the Attorney General’s office declared that the peace activists captured on the high seas, who had no intention whatsoever of entering Israel, had “tried to enter Israel illegally”, and brought them before a judge for the extension of their arrest under the law that concerns “illegal entry into Israel”?
ANSWER: They had the intention to go to Gaza. Gaza is under Israeli blockade. Therefore if the activists intend to breach the blockade, Israel will consider them having the intention for illegal entry into Israel. I know, it is a BS logic because the premise is wrong. First, the activists were captured on high seas, not Israeli territorial waters. Second, Israel has no right to raid people just because of their intention as long as this intention has not yet materialized. there were other ways to stop them.
14.Who is responsible for these contradictory legal claims, when the Israeli government argues one minute that Israel has “separated itself from the Gaza Strip” and that the “occupation there has come to an end” – and the next minute claims sovereignty over the coastal waters of the Strip?
ANSWER: The USA for blindly supporting Israel. The rest of the world governments as they are cowards, and do not want to upset the few "elite". And for the change of the Israeli mind every now and then, Here is a text of their "Rosh Hashanah/new year) prayer. Read between the lines, and reach your own conclusion.
15.Questions concerning the decision to attack the flotilla:When did the preparation for this flotilla become known to the Israeli intelligence services? (Evidence on this may be heard in camera.)
ANSWER: Why in camera? Everybody should know. And do you think the MOSSAD's hands are clean. No "F*****"" way.
16.When was this brought to the attention of the Prime Minister, the Minister of Defense, the Cabinet, the Committee of Seven (in charge of security matters) and the IDF Chief of Staff? (ditto)
ANSWER: Everybody knew enough time before hand, including the Committee of thirteen, if one exists.
17.What were the deliberations of these officials and institutions? (ditto)
ANSWER: How to come up with a plot to attack the Freedom Aid Flotilla. What else do you think?! Do you think they were discussing how to increase the olive product so that they can export some to Gaza.
18.What intelligence was submitted to each of them? (ditto)
ANSWER: Lies like: 1. There were terrorist linked to Al-Qaeda, 2. There were weapons intended to be smuggled to Hamas, and 3. There were Barbie dolls intended to be given to the miserable Gazan children.
19.When, by whom and how was the decision taken to stop the flotilla by force?
ANSWER: Each and every individual in Israel had his/her heart set on stopping the flotilla by force, thanks to the brainwashing campaign waged by the government before hand.
20.Is it true that the secretary of the cabinet, Tzvi Hauser, warned of the severe consequences of such action and advised letting the flotilla sail to Gaza?
ANSWER: True or not, it is of no importance as at the end of the day everybody listen including the secretary of the cabinet, Tzvi Hauser.
21.Were there others who also advised doing so?
ANSWER: ditto.
22.Was the Foreign Ministry a full partner in all the discussions?
ANSWER: ditto
23.If so, did the Foreign Ministry warn of the impact of such an action on our relations with Turkey and other countries?
ANSWER: Impact my rear-end. They're all a pack of wolves.
24. In light of the fact that, prior to the incident, the Turkish government informed the Israeli Foreign Ministry that the flotilla was organized by a private organization which is not under the control of the government and does not violate any Turkish law – did the Foreign Ministry consider approaching the organization in order to try to reach an agreement to avoid violence?
ANSWER: I do not think the Foreign Ministry considered anything. The Ministry follow orders. and the order come from the blood-thirsty people who are running the satanic state of Israel, and who like show business.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Say what is on your mind, but observe the rules of debate. No foul language is allowed, no matter how anger-evoking the posted article may be.
Thank you,
TruthSeeker