PALESTINE/ISRAEL: What else does the evil and the rogue state of israel have up her sleeve???

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Transportation Minister Yisrael Katz (center) inaugurate the Sderot train station, in Sderot, Israel, Dec. 2013. (photo by Israel Train Company)

Will Israel build island next to Gaza?

The binational state allegation is “a form of intimidation, to convince us to forfeit territory. No such reality can ever come into existence,” Transportation Minister Yisrael Katz told Al-Monitor. Katz, who is also minister of intelligence and atomic energy, uttered the statement above in response to US Secretary of State John Kerry’s speech at the Saban Forum (Dec. 5), in which he argued that without an agreement with the Palestinians, “Israel cannot be Jewish and democratic.”

In an attempt to deal with the terror wave that broke out about two months ago, Katz, a member of the diplomatic-security Cabinet, proposes that a total closure be imposed on the Palestinian territories where the terror attacks originate. Katz says that the day that portable concrete barriers were erected in East Jerusalem (Oct. 18), in an attempt to lessen the friction between Jews and Arabs in the area, was a “black day” for him. Regarding the diplomatic initiative, he continues to promote the concept of an artificial island in Gaza’s ocean.

The text of the interview follows:

Al-Monitor:  John Kerry sounds the alarm over a binational state. Are you concerned that the government, of which you are a member, will be responsible for the loss of the Jewish majority in Israel?

Katz:  People have to understand that a binational state does not mean living directly next to each other. A binational state can exist only if the Palestinians have the right to vote. In the [1993] Oslo Accord, a miracle fell into our laps when the Palestinians insisted that the East Jerusalem Arabs would vote for the Palestinian parliament, though through the mail. For us, this is a classic arrangement: They live within Israeli sovereignty with municipal rights and find their political expression in the Palestinian parliament.

Al-Monitor:  Nevertheless, this is a very weighty proposal that you have in mind, don't you think?

Katz:  Ironically, those people who are very sensitive to human rights, when they talk about evacuating the territories, they bring up the demographic rationale or the democratic rationale, according to which we don’t need the Arabs here. I wonder how the Palestinians view this reasoning, the essence of which is that the greatest fear of the Israeli left is that the Palestinians will be part of the state or will vote here for the Knesset. So they use this argument for everything. This argument is a form of intimidation, to convince us to forfeit territory. No such reality can ever come into existence. And besides, Israel can always tell itself that it hunkers down within its borders plus Area C [of the West Bank, under Israeli civil and security control] not including the Palestinians, and so, there’s no national state. Gaza is, in any case, already a totally different geographic area over which Israel has no formal or de facto control; therefore, I proposed the idea of the artificial lake in Gaza.

Al-Monitor:  And how is your idea progressing?

Katz:  I have been promoting this scheme for years, ever since the disengagement [from Gaza in 2005]. I said, "If it’s going to happen anyway, then we may as well relieve ourselves of responsibility toward Gaza." Today, we have no jurisdiction there, but we do have responsibility because we don’t give the Gazans access to the world, due to security considerations; simultaneously, the Egyptians also cut them off. So humanitarian and diplomatic responsibility fall on us. That’s why the attitude toward our security activities, even if is defensive in nature, is like the stance toward an entity responsible for a certain population.

I looked into the subject of artificial islands, and then I said that an island should be created 4½ kilometers [2.8 miles] from the Gaza coast, with a 4-kilometer [2½-mile] bridge. The island will be 4 kilometers by 2 kilometers. An 8-kilometer expanse is more than the territory belonging to the Israeli city of Bnei Brak. There will be a seaport and airport there, under international control. Israel will oversee overall security, the inspection of boats that enter and the passageways. Security rights must be recognized from the get-go. The Palestinians will receive seaport and aviation services. This gives them an opening to the world, and our security needs are answered too. The world will be happy to underwrite this island, the Muslim countries too, also China. Hotels can be built there; with a little luck, a casino too.

Should the State of Israel decide to promote this concept, our security situation will even improve. You can’t dig tunnels into the ocean, and a bridge can always be disconnected. This is an original idea, and also viewed as a diplomatic initiative. I can’t go into too many details, but I can say that there is a certain amount of readiness for such a scheme.

Al Monitor:  Are we nearing the end of the terror wave?

Katz:  What is disturbing is that there is not even one security official who can point to a certified date and say that he evaluates that the current terror attacks will cease by that date. This is the most significant issue. Therefore, our coping techniques are limited in scope since there is no expiration date for this terror campaign. It is the political echelons, not the security echelons, that must decide when we reach the point where we refuse to tolerate the scope of terror and decide to change our mode of action. In other words, to deviate from our current policy that dictates, "Let’s separate the population involved [in terror] from the population that is not involved; let’s allow everyone to travel on the roads and not impose closures."

There is one spot on the Jalama checkpoint from [the Palestinian city] of Jenin to Israel that, after attacks took place there all week, Israel closed free passage at that checkpoint. Within two days, the local Palestinian leadership took action to prevent attacks. And even though we’re talking about Islamic State-style terror, I don’t believe in a total cutoff between the isolated [terrorist] and his surroundings. Ultimately, it’s been proven in the Jenin checkpoint that when it comes to protecting its interests, the Palestinian system is able to get its act together. It sends Palestinian policemen and no more stabbings occur.

Al Monitor:  But the Shin Bet head and the heads of Israel’s other security systems argue that if the general Palestinian population will suffer, then the terror will worsen. What do you think about their position?

Katz:  That’s a very logical position, which I backed. But at a certain point, one has to change one’s modus operandi. That’s the difference between the security and political echelons. The security echelon has to do maximum activity with minimum casualties, and the political echelon has to decide if that is something it is willing to contain.

The most problematic point I see is that a situation may arise in which if we don’t ratchet things up a notch and try to vanquish [the terror attacks] completely, even though it means taking risks, this could be viewed as weakness [by the Palestinians] and lead to wider circles of terror. For example, the Palestinian apparatuses such as the Tanzim [Fatah militia] and others which at the moment have not yet entered the fray, [could get involved, too].

The day they tried to erect a barrier inside Jerusalem [in October, between Jewish and Arab areas] was a black day for me. This was because it symbolized that terror attacks were able to force Israel to do things that it had never been willing to do before [a de facto division of Jerusalem], not in its wildest dreams, not during the Oslo Accord, not in [any public] statements. Therefore, we must avoid at all costs doing anything that would give the image that we are rewarding terror. Image is of great importance. And, of course, the results. We must take action so that no Jew will be stabbed.

Al Monitor:  Are you saying that we have reached the point at which Israel needs to escalate its responses?

Katz:  No. What I’m saying is that we must discuss this all the time. It is part of the discourse. It should not be axiomatic that we must act in accordance with methods that were appropriate in the first and second intifadas, when we faced [terror] organizations. Now we see a phenomenon connected to the [social] networks and incitement, and a global phenomenon of radical Islam involving copycat attacks. You need to develop all kinds of sophisticated methods to deal with this, and we do that all the time. But at the end of the day, you reach a point where you say to [Palestinian President Mahmoud] Abbas that when all’s said and done, you [Abbas] don’t want the [Palestinian] Authority to collapse and neither do we.

Someone has to tell the Palestinian population in areas that disseminate terror, "You will all pay a price. You won’t go to work in Israel, and you won’t drive on the roads on which there are vehicular attacks and stabbings." If it’s our safety versus unrestricted movement at the Etzion bloc junction, then the junction will be closed to Palestinian movement for a limited period. If terror attacks continue to originate from Hebron at this scale, their rights will be revoked and they will have to decide themselves what is more important to them: to applaud the attackers or grab the children and call them to task. This is the dilemma faced by the government.

Al Monitor:  After months of terror, can you say what the reason is for the eruption of this current terror wave?

Katz:  Do the French understand why French citizens stormed and slaughtered them [Nov. 13]? Does one understand why girls from England go to marry Islamic State fighters? There are several factors: One is connected to the national conflict, but the other element is connected to Hamas-style religious fanaticism; it is a holy war. There is the Islamic State phenomenon of joining the warped brand of Islam that is marketed by the [social] networks, an Islam that involves cutting off people’s heads, that blows away the youths. This is something we never coped with in the past. What motivates two spouses in the United States to slaughter people [Dec. 2] in an organization that assists the disabled? But while the rest of the world does not understand, we understand a bit more.

The bottom line is, how long will we continue to say, "President Abbas incites but is not responsible?" How long can we continue to grant exemptions from responsibility? In fact, we can ask the bigger question: If Abbas is not responsible, then how can goodwill measures to him cause cessation of the violence? The American attempt to mediate now stems from the assumption that Abbas can calm the flames, so is he responsible for setting the fires in the first place?

Al Monitor:  Politically, is there still a chance for a unity government with the Zionist Camp?

Katz:  That is connected to coalition arithmetic. I don’t think that Netanyahu now thinks that he needs [head of the Zionist Camp Isaac] Buji Herzog for worldwide legitimacy. When there are terror attacks [around the globe], the world understands us better. Recently, I attended a meeting with Greece’s Prime Minister [Alexis Tsipras], who is viewed as a socialist bordering on communist, after he was re-elected a second time. He spoke about refugees and fences and sounded like a true [right-wing] Likud member. He said to us, "I understand that you worried about changes in Greek policy due to my rise to power, so I would like to inform you that there will, indeed, be a change, because relations [between the two countries] will be much better." We hear similar statements from more countries. Therefore, the American administration has minimal desire to confront us, because, ultimately, we are the most stable ally in the region, and cooperation with us is more vital than ever. In addition, the [Americans] don’t see that President Abbas is capable of rising, or wants to rise, above the current radical wave [of terror].

Yes, they're all Gazan, Mr. Katz

ZIONISM: Zionist Power: Swindlers and Impunity, Traitors and Pardons

Zionist Power: Swindlers and Impunity, Traitors and Pardons 

Thursday, 3 December 2015

By James Petras

We work so hard to establish ourselves and to get where we are and to have somebody (Jonathan Pollard) screw it up… and then have Jewish organizations line up behind this guy and try to make him out a hero of the Jewish people, it bothers the hell out of me…— Admiral Sumner Shapiro, US Navy Rear Admiral who served as Director of the Office of Naval Intelligence (1978-82), Washington Post, 6/16/2008

We … feel obligated to go on record with the facts regarding Pollard in order to dispel the myths that have arisen from the clever public relations campaign… aiming at transforming Pollard from greedy, arrogant betrayer of the American national trust into Pollard committed Israeli patriot.— Sumner Shapiro, William Studeman, John Butts and Thomas Brooks, former Directors of Naval Intelligence cited in Ronald Olive, Capturing Jonathan Pollard: How one of the Most Notorious Spies in American History Was Brought to Justice, Annapolis Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 248.

November 30, 2015 "Information Clearing House" -  Over two decades ago, Harvard political science professor, Samuel Huntington, argued that global politics would be defined by a ‘clash of civilizations’. His theories have found some of the most aggressive advocates among militant Zionists, inside Israel and abroad.

During the past month, the Israeli regime has been slaughtering and wounding thousands of Palestinians in the West Bank, Gaza and Israel. The Israeli state terrorists, who commit mass murder in Palestine, are part of a movement that sees an inevitable mortal final battle between Zionism and the Islamic and Western world.

Many Western democratic leaders have questioned Huntington’s prognosis and discreetly refuted the Zionist belief that different faiths and cultures cannot live and work together.

In the aftermath of the Paris attacks, leading Western Zionist ideologues have argued that, while liberal values should be reaffirmed, the US and EU leaders must recognize ‘malign global Islamic trends’. Influential Western Zionist journalists and ideologues, who dominate the mass media, argue that ‘hardline Islamism’ is on the rise, even in previously moderate Muslim countries like Turkey, Malaysia and Bangladesh… These ideologues (for example Gideon Rachman of the Financial Times) systematically avoid commenting on the rise of hardline Zionism in its most racist form in Israel and the conversion of formerly moderate Zionist organizations into willing accomplices of Israeli state terror against a captive people.

Together, these developments in Israel and among the major Zionist organizations in the US and the European Union have limited the space for critics of the ‘clash of civilizations’ dogma.

State terror assaults, such as those taking place daily in Palestine, incite tensions between Zionists and non-Zionists – and that is their intent. Larger structural and systemic forces are at work and are driving Zionist radicalization. One of the most pernicious is the way in which wealthy US and EU Zionist individuals and organizations, in particular the Presidents of the 52 Major American Jewish Organizations, have used their economic power to spread the most intolerant forms of Judaism into the rest of the Western World. 

The effects are now visible in the major political institutions and media of the US, England and the Continent. Previously, France was held up as an example of a successful multi-cultural nation – a dubious assumption as any historian of colonial France can testify. But that image is rapidly changing. Influential Zionists have fomented widespread Islamophobia and authored legislation restricting free speech which has outlawed criticism of Israel as ‘anti-Semitism’.

French civil libertarians have noted that political and social space has increasingly narrowed for ‘non-Zionists’, especially for anyone critical of Israel’s state terrorism. In other words, there is immense pressure in France to ‘keep quiet’ or self-censor in the face of Zionist racist brutality – so much for Les Droits de L’Homme et Du Citoyen. 

For over a decade, Zionist influence, especially from Israel’s far-right Netanyahu regime, has eroded the French version of ‘moderate Zionism’, replacing it with a more doctrinaire, exclusivist and authoritarian version. World-wide condemnation of Israel’s massacre of over 4,000 entrapped Palestinians in Gaza, the world largest prison camp, led the Netanyahu regime to resort to a virulent Zionist version of ‘identity politics’ to rally support for the slaughter – or enforce silence among the horrified. Israeli Cabinet ministers recently denounced US President Obama and Secretary of State Kerry as ‘anti-Semites’ for their administration’s negotiations over Iran.

Numerous prestigious rabbis have blessed the killing of unarmed Palestinians. A prominent Israeli jurist, Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked urged the killing of Arab women so they would not give birth to ‘little snakes’. Israeli-Jewish judges have exonerated IDF soldiers, police, and settlers for killing Palestinian children – even unarmed teenaged Arab girls hysterical over their brutal humiliation. And world public opinion is ordered to ‘move along, look away, nothing for you to see here…
’

All the major overseas Jewish organizations have marched in step. In the United States, a country with a democratic constitution and centuries-old Bill of Rights, self-styled ‘mainstream Zionists’ have defended Israeli spies and criminals, as well as un-extraditable swindlers, and organized nation-wide networks of university, professional and business organizations to demand the firing of colleagues and to suppress free speech and free assembly of Israel’s critics. 

First and foremost, major Zionist organizations and leaders have stoked the fire of anti-Muslim and anti-Arab racist rhetoric, which has become commonplace in the mass media and among Republican candidates engaged in the current Presidential nomination campaign.

The convergence of these developments in Israel and among the Zionist power configuration in North America, Europe and the Middle East is fueling the idea of a ‘clash of civilizations’.

The ideological marriage of Herzl and Huntington is fast eroding the former reality of Jewish and non-Jewish integration and intermingling across the globe. The alternative to a plural civilization is more primitive and brutal injustice, violence and death.

Contemporary Manifestations of Zionist Power: The Release of the Most Damaging Spy-Traitor in US History 

On November 20, 2015, former Naval Intelligence Analyst, Jonathan Pollard, the American-Jewish spy for Israel, was freed by the Obama regime under Zionist pressure after repeated refusals by three Republican and one Democratic President and over the objections of the heads of all 27 major US intelligence agencies. The significance of this release has to be viewed against the history of Pollard’s crimes. 

Fabricating Lies to Justify Obama’s Release of Pollard

The mass media and the 52 Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations (AIPAC, ADL, etc…), claim that 1) Pollard committed espionage against US security for ‘altruistic reasons’ — a deep concern for Israel’s security and because US intelligence agencies had refused to share crucial information with Israel’s intelligence counterparts (out of anti-Semitism), 2) the information Pollard handed over had no lasting harm and did not endanger US security, and 3) Pollard’s punishment was ‘excessive’, his ‘repentance’ was sincere and his example precluded any future Israeli espionage activity against the US. These assertions are completely false. 

Pollard was a mercenary, spying against the US out of greed. He lived a decadent, expensive lifestyle and had demanded the Israelis pay him a total package of over $250,000 for his work. The Israeli Embassy was known to have paid Pollard, a US Naval Analyst, to spy against the United States government. Court records reveal that he collected over $50,000 for ‘expenses’ during his espionage career, including expensive jewelry, and a monthly stipend of $2500. Court records furthermore reveal that he offered to sell additional secret documents to Pakistan, Apartheid South Africa, Australia, Russia and some Middle East countries. He collected dozens of box-loads of confidential documents, many of which had nothing to do with the ‘security of Israel’, but were deemed essential to US global security, including a top secret ten volume set of National Security Agency high level codes exposing the most advanced means and methods of espionage and the main targets of intelligence collection. Some of his ‘vacuumed-up’ treasure trove included the identity of US intelligence operatives and assets in Warsaw pact countries and the Soviet Union. The 27 US intelligence agencies have consistently opposed Pollard’s release because his sale of this information to the Israelis led to the capture and execution of US operatives after Israel handed over this top-secret information to the Soviet Union in exchange for allowing Soviet Jews to immigrate to Israel in massive numbers. Needless to say, this treason crippled US intelligence operations and led to deaths. US military and intelligence officials view Pollard as having ‘blood on his hands’. So much for the ‘altruistic American Zionist keen on helping insecure, little Israel.’ Years of Zionist propaganda and lobbying have obscured this aspect of Pollard’s crimes. 

Excessive Punishment or Excessive Leniency?

Far right Israeli Cabinet Ministers and liberal American Jews, supporters and opponents of Pollard, pundits and editorialists argue that the life imprisonment given to Pollard was out of proportion to the crime of treason. They claim that, after 30 years, he was ‘overdue’ for release.

The severity of the punishment is determined by the crime and the damage caused. In case of treason and espionage committed by US officials, (especially for money), the sentence is always severe. The leaders of the John Anthony Walker Naval spy ring were given multiple life sentences in 1985 and there are many other similar cases. 

Among the documents Pollard handed over to his Israeli handlers (operating out of the Israeli Embassy), was US intelligence on strategic installations in Syria, Lebanon and Iraq. No doubt, this provided Israel with strategic coordinates to bomb major security facilities in those countries as well as facilitated their brutal invasion and occupation of Lebanon in the 1980s. Pollard’s treachery led to the death of thousands of civilian lives in Lebanon and facilitated the wars in Iraq and Syria. The damage to those countries and to innocent people would not have been considered by the judge in Pollard’s life sentence – but it must be considered here, in understanding the enormity of his crimes. Pollard has boasted that he was operating out of a ‘racial imperative’ to protect Israel. 

Pollard did not serve a life sentence. In fact, while in prison he became an Israeli citizen, a salaried officer in the Israeli armed forces and, after divorcing his American wife (who had also engaged in espionage for pay and served several years in prison), he re-married a Canadian-Israeli woman. This sheds a different light on the ‘severity’ of a life sentence for treason.

Pollard did not serve this ‘life sentence’. He was paroled in November 2015 (to the cheers of his adoring Jewish-American fans) demonstrating the wealth and power of American Zionists and their ability to buy the support of US politicians, domestic and foreign notables and the entire Israeli-Jewish political spectrum-and push aside the objections of the heads of the three major US armed services and intelligence agencies. 

Israeli public opinion overwhelmingly supports Pollard and regards him as a ‘role model’ for other US Zionists in official positions. Contrary to Israeli lies, several other major Israeli spy operations occurred in the US after Pollard, including the case involving AIPAC officials, Rosen and Weissman, and Pentagon analyst Larry Franklin during George W. Bush’s administration.

In stark contrast to the freeing of an Israeli spy responsible for endangering the security of thousands of US operatives abroad and millions of innocent civilians, two authentic American political prisoners, who have fought for the rights of minorities, rot in jail with no prospect of freedom. Leonard Peltier, a Native American leader has spent 38 years in the highest security prison and Mumia Abu-Jamal, an African-American leader from Philadelphia, whose 33 years in prison have been on death row or brutal solitary confinement. Both were framed by perjured evidence in a parody of justice, which has revolted millions around the world. Neither threatened US security. Over the years, numerous witnesses, legal authorities and academics have testified regarding the miscarriage of justice that characterized their ‘show trials’ and have pleaded for their humanitarian release. 

Unlike Pollard, and despite decades of worldwide campaigns for their release, Peltier and Abu-Jamal will probably die entombed in prison. Unlike Pollard, their cases were never about treason, selling information and greed. They have worked hard for justice within their communities, hence earning the hatred of the police state. They fought to serve their oppressed American communities, rather than an oppressive and racist Israeli elite – determined to oppress and erase the native Palestinian population. 

The decisive factor has been the political power of Pollard’s supporters, the US Zionist Power Configuration, which leads President Obama and 430 US members of Congress by the nose. Through their media connections, they can lie about Pollard’s case and his motives. They can minimize the consequences of his treason and twist the arms of obedient politicians to support a traitor. Despite the fact that scores of high-ranking US intelligence and military officials have repeatedly attested to the damage inflicted by Pollard on the US, campaign finance hungry politicians recite the Zionist line that Pollard’s treason did not warrant a harsh sentence!

Beyond the immediate shame of a US president caving in to Israeli pressure with regard to this spy, there is the issue of the flagrant double standard: 

Why do Israeli spies (or American Zionist traitors) evoke the unconditional support of the entire US Zionist apparatus? Why do thousands of rabbis, hundreds of movie executives and media moguls and scores of billionaires (talk about the 0.01%!) campaign on behalf of this arrogant, greedy thief? Why does Pollard merit a totally different standard of justice, in stark contrast to the vast majority of American minorities – who can rot in dungeons even when clearly innocent? Why does a self-described Israeli (who renounced his US citizenship in jail), who sold vital national secrets to fund a decadent life-style and for what he described as a ‘race imperative’ merit such favors while hundreds of thousands of poor US citizens are routinely denied leniency – let alone mercy? Clearly, the interests of Israel, a foreign regime, carry much greater weight within the US judicial system than millions of American minorities
 

Cyber Crimes of Our Times: Billionaire Israeli Swindlers and the Chinese Military

For over three years, the Obama administration, the NSA and the Secretary of Defense, Ashton Carter have fed their media mouthpieces breathless denunciations against China for cyber-theft. Ever week, there are lurid stories about the theft of confidential US industrial, military and political intelligence committed by the Chinese. The Obama regime has followed up his charges of ‘cybertheft” by threatening to confront China in the South China Sea, apply sanctions and raise the military ante in the Pacific against the world’s most dynamic economic superpower. 

Assistant Secretary of State, Victoria Nuland (Nudelman-Kaplan) has claimed that Chinese cyber theft is a top national security threat requiring an immediate military-security response. US officials have provided no evidence that Chinese officials, at any level, are involved in espionage. Moreover, they have presented no proof that cyber theft is a policy of the Chinese government! There has been no evidence that these alleged thefts have damaged US companies or security interests. Nevertheless, US hostility toward China has been justified by unproven accusations and are used to increase the possibility of a major confrontation.

Contrasted with the ‘allegations’ against the Chinese, three ‘Israeli businessmen’ have been officially charged by US prosecutors with running a multi-billion dollar cyber-hacking scam within the US over the past five years. Dubbed the biggest financial hack in US history, the story hardly made headlines in the US media and was conveniently buried by subsequent ‘terror attacks’ in Europe. 

The case is instructive. Three Israelis (one a US-Israeli dual citizen) hacked-attacked ten of the largest US financial institutions, including JP Morgan Chase and Fidelity Investments, as well as the Wall Street Journal … downloading protected information on over 100 million Americans – the biggest hack-attack in US history. Gery Shalon, Ziv Orenstein and Joshua Samuel Aaron employed hundreds of employees in Israel and elsewhere running a mega-cybercriminal enterprise. 

According to the Financial Times (11/11/2015, p1), “the hacks took place from 2012 to mid-2015 and were aimed at aiding stock market manipulation that generated tens of millions of dollars.” In addition to selling ‘pumped-up’ stocks to millions of customers of the companies they had hacked, Shalom et al. launched cyber attacks to launder millions (more likely billions) for illegal drug and counterfeit software dealers, malicious malware distributors, illegal online casinos and an illegal ‘bitcoin exchange’ known as ‘Coin.mx.’ Someone within the financial security apparatus of the US government (white collar crime unit) must have tipped them off. They are safe in Israel; the Netanyahu regime has yet to act on a US extradition order, although they are reportedly under ‘house arrest’ in their villas. 

In contrast to the on-going bellicose rhetoric, which Washington has directed against China’s alleged hackers, Washington has been ‘very reluctant’ to press the issue of extraditing the cyber-thieves with its ‘special partner’ in Tel Aviv. 

Israeli super-hackers launched virulent attacks against major US financial institutions and American investors with apparent impunity, following the practice of Israeli info-tech operatives who have raided US military, technology and industrial sites for years.

While the US sends air squadrons and an armada of warships to Chinese waters over a few sand-bars, and brays about arresting Chinese researchers (who it later released with no charges) for alleged cyber-theft, it cannot persuade its ‘closest strategic ally’, Israel, to hand over a trio of formally charged swindlers. Instead, the US increased its annual $3 billion in military aid and provides an open market for Israeli ‘security’ products based on stolen US technology! 

The reason for the differential response is not the nature of the ‘crimes’ – it is who commits the crimes! Israeli dominance of US politics via the unconditional support of its US Zionist power configuration ensures impunity for Israeli citizens, including the ability to delay or postpone the extradition of notorious multi-billion cyber thieves! Washington feels free to accuse China, without proof of official Chinese complicity, despite overwhelming evidence, while it cannot persuade its close ‘friend’ Israel to extradite criminals. Netanyahu, backed by his Israeli-Jewish public will decide if, when and where to extradite. When it comes to shielding Israeli or American-Israeli criminals from American justice, Israel treats its ally in Washington like an enemy. 

Zionist political clout is evident in Washington’s judicial leniency toward other mega-swindlers with ties to Israel. Michael Milken contributed millions of (swindled) dollars to Israeli and US Zionist programs and won a ‘get out of jail’ card despite his conviction for major financial scams. He served 2 years out of a 10-year sentence and was granted a ‘humanitarian release’ because he was ‘dying’ of extensive terminal metastatic prostate cancer. So far, Michael’s quarter century of miraculous remission from ‘terminal metastatic prostate cancer’ constitutes a first in the annals of urologic cancer! He has gone on to re-constitute his fortune and prominence, while welfare mothers who took a few extra dollars rot in jail. 

Ivan Boesky, another uber-Zionist and mega-donor to Israel was a swindler of gargantuan proportions. He raked in hundreds of millions a year. He was tried, convicted and sentenced to a mere 42 months in prison. He was out in less than 24 months, thanks to the support of Marc Rich, a mega- billionaire rogue trader who broke US sanctions against trading with enemies, was also a self-described agent for the Israeli Mossad. Despite having been convicted in absentia in US courts for fraud, (he had skipped bail for Switzerland), President ‘Bill’ Clinton pardoned the ‘absentee felon’ in abstentia– a historical first for a criminal who had never spent a day in the jail. Mrs. Rich’s $100,000 donation to the Hilary Clinton New York senatorial campaign probably did little to influence the President’s sense of mercy…..

However, ‘Bernie’ Madoff, a $50 billion dollar swindler’ who gave huge amounts of illicit earnings to Zionist charities and projects in Israel was convicted and sentenced to over 100 years in prison. Unlike the above mentioned ‘untouchables’, Madoff will never breathe free again because he made the unforgivable mistake of mostly swindling other Jews, ardent Zionists and even ripping off a number of pro-Israel foundations. His differential treatment stems from his poor choice of victims rather than the crimes… Otherwise he might now be enjoying a comfortable villa in Israel than a cold cell in Pennsylvania 

Conclusions

Israeli capacity to manipulate and influence the American judicial process is based on 52 powerful front organizations – organized in the Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations. This situation has made a mockery of the American court system and feeds the cynicism and bitterness of the average American. Zionist officials and allies occupy strategic position within the White House and judiciary. 

Through their influence in the mass media, they converted a grotesque mercenary spy, like Jonathan Pollard, into an altruistic, Israeli-Jewish patriot, celebrated throughout Israel and within US Zionist circles. Veteran American intelligence and military official who opposed his release have been painted with the broad brush of ‘anti-Semite’. The formidable Zionist power configuration, nurtured and financed by mega-swindlers, successfully secured his release. Zionist dominance essentially guarantees that the US will treat an indicted Israeli cyber-thief with extreme tact, supplicating the Israeli government for their extradition, while going ballistic over an alleged Chinese hacker. 

Few progressive web sites or even the micro-Marxist journals confront these issues, more out of moral cowardice (self-censorship) than ignorance. Instead they bleat general clichés and ‘radical rhetoric’ about ‘US imperialism’ and the ‘rise of the right’ without identifying the precise social and political identity of the forces who move national policy. In a word, the Zionist Power Configuration gets more than a ‘free ride’. Across the political spectrum it continues to campaign on behalf of Israeli spies and Zionist financial swindlers. This corruption of the American judicial system and the betrayal of American trust have far-reaching consequences and undermine efforts to effectively address major national problems. 

James Petras is a Bartle Professor (Emeritus) of Sociology at Binghamton University, New York.

FOX NEWS: Fox, you stink...

Fox News Planted Fake Story 
Establishing ISIS Guilt Within Moments of Paris Attacks

POSTED BY BRANDON MARTINEZ ON NOVEMBER 21, 2015 IN FRANCE, MIDDLE EAST, NEWS & ANALYSIS, WORLD | | 7 RESPONSES

by Brandon Martinez

Remember those early reports from the Paris attack coverage which claimed that a terrorist ‘suspect’ had been arrested at the Bataclan theater and told police “I am from ISIS”? The story spread like wildfire on neocon and kosher conservative blogs, Jihad Watch, Breitbart and Infowars chief among them, but originated from a Fox News live report which was a bit more detailed, stating:

“There is one man who has been arrested in Paris tonight. Arrested by French authorities who told French authorities ‘I am from ISIS.’ I now have further information: that suspect has just told French police within the last hour or so, ‘I am Syrian, I was here with two others, we were recruited by ISIS and this is … an ISIS mission.’ [The man] was quoted from inside the [Bataclan] theater saying, ‘This is for Syria. Allahu Akbar.’”

Considering that no suspects were taken into custody alive that day – all were said to have been killed by police or by suicide (the Guardian, for instance, tells us: “Eight attackers also died, police say, seven of them by detonating explosive suicide belts”) – this story, originating with the cartoonish neocon propaganda outlet Fox News, is brazenly planted disinformation. So who was this mysterious apprehended ‘suspect’ that conveniently handed the news media a perfect sound-bite to immediately link the Paris attacks to Syria and ISIS? Clearly a phantom created by the media itself to do just that – instantly point the finger of culpability at a predetermined fall guy, in this case ISIS, and seal that rumor in the public’s consciousness where it now remains etched in stone.

There is very little chance that a news organization could make such an egregious “mistake” about a non-existent ‘suspect’ making non-existent ‘confessions’ to police, which never actually took place. And reflecting on Fox News’ notorious reputation as a factory of lies for the Neocon-Zionist propaganda machine, this latest example of false reporting cannot be anything but a deliberate attempt at disinformation designed to hoodwink the public with another phony ‘terror’ narrative.

In addition to the fact that the Fox story is provably false now that we know all the alleged assailants were killed and none were captured alive on that day, other reports undermine the anonymous “witness” claims that the gunmen in the Bataclan theater were shouting things like “this is for Syria” and “Allahu Akhbar.”

A CNN interview with a purported eyewitness who was inside the Bataclan concert hall, radio reporter Julien Pearce, indicates that the gunmen did not shout anything during the operation. In response to a question about if the shooters were “speaking in French or Arabic or anything you could discern,” Pearce told Wolf Blitzer: “Nothing, nothing. I heard nothing, just the yelling and screaming of the people. They [the gunmen] didn’t shout anything. They didn’t say anything. Not Allah Akhbar or something like this. They said nothing. They just shot. They just shoot. They were just shooting to people.”

Thus, the media’s peddling of unverified stories about unnamed “witnesses” reporting the gunmen shouting things that conveniently attribute identity and motive to the attackers – “this is for Syria” and “Allahu Akhbar” – should be dismissed as yet more planted propaganda, like the false ‘I am from ISIS’ fairytale, to immediately fix the narrative around the predetermined script of an “ISIS attack.” It is more likely that this named and identified witness, Julien Pearce, is telling the truth that the gunmen did not blurt out these things during the attack. He is identified, was in the concert hall as it happened and has no reason to lie, unlike unnamed, anonymous witnesses whose unverified claims bolster the establishment narrative.

Also highly suspicious and questionable is the assertion that passports belonging to the two alleged ‘suicide bombers’ who, we are told, detonated outside the Stade de France, were discovered by police. “Syrian and Egyptian passports found near bodies of suicide bombers at Stade de France,” a headline in the UK Independent reads, citing French security officials. This dubious “claim” cannot be taken seriously. Why would individuals on a suicide mission even carry passports on their person? You do not need a passport to travel around Paris. And how did such passports survive the explosions without being destroyed along with the bodies of their owners? A logical and rational observer should conclude, as I have, that this story appears to be another “planted” clue that authorities invented to establish a Middle Eastern, especially Syrian, connection to the events of Friday the 13th.

Many analysts have likened this to the fantastical and downright comical claim that an Al Qaeda terrorist’s passport was discovered near the World Trade Center on 9/11. By way of some heavenly intervention, the indestructible Al Qaeda passport managed to survive both the explosive, fiery plane crash into the tower and a hundred-foot tumble to the ground, only to be found by authorities in pristine condition, which was then expediently waved in front of the cameras as “proof” that Muslims did 9/11.

All of the standard hallmarks and patterns of the false flag terror formula are beginning to emerge from the real or imagined carnage in Paris.

Please do all you can 

to circulate this Viral interview far and wide. 

You will never see this interview in CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, ABC, Fox