Binary Systems: All computers must be Jewish because they are binary..

Life is not solely a “yes” or “no”, or in another word “Zero or One”. In life, there is a great area in between. Tell that to the Israelis and non-Jews who talk their syllables and walk in their footsteps, but they'll not understand it. They have the mentality of a computer (not a sophisticated one, though”. And since that is the case, it does not make them smart as some may think. Computers are not smart. We are. We invented the computers as a tool to help us do our chores like a telescope, which is a tool to extend our vision, a hearing aid which is another tool to extends our hearing, a  computer is the same; a device to help us execute an array of functions, not execute “Palestinians”.

“Garbage in, garbage out”, it is said as far as computers are concerned. As the binary Jewish mentality has nothing fed in but garbage, therefore, there actions are nothing but the same. Their mentality is: 1. “Jews versus Gentile”; a duality, 2. “we’re the ‘chosen people, they are goyim’”; a duality, and 3. “you be with us, or you’re anti-Semitic, a duality.

And when the person who is critical of their actions is a Jew like Gilad Atzmon, Noam Chomsky, and many others, then he/she is a ‘self-hating Jew’”.

Noam Chomsky

In an interview with the Jerusalem Post, one of the Jewish settlers in Sheikh Jarrah, an area in Israeli-occupied East Jerusalem where Palestinians are being evicted from their homes, explained that he had no “personal problems” with “the Arabs” – but insisted that “they have to admit who the landlord is here.”. What a hypocrisy incarnate and duality!

ABOVE: Israeli Children learning to kill Arabs. BELOW: Israeli children signing missiles; gifts to be sent to the Palestinian children.

The above two pictures demonstrate the type of environment where and how Jewish children are brought up; indoctrination to violence. Is the above settler trying to say that he grew up in a different environment? Do settles and other Israelis  really have nothing personal against the Arabs? I doubt that strongly.

Those who attempt to beautify the ugly fascist and racist face of Zionism, who apply themselves as a dripping lipstick on the lips of a pig in a futile attempt to revamp its gruesome features, those who delude themselves that if they use their lovey-dovey words, they could disguise the true vile nature, the wicked chauvinistic ideology and incessant crimes of the monster of Zion, those who feel no shame in defending a disgraceful entity which happened to be established by terror and maintained by terror and continue to exist by terrorizing those under its control, those who act as a pathetic frayed fig leaf trying to conceal the obscenity and hideous disgrace of their state which was audaciously built upon the destruction of another nation, those who ludicrously still marvel at and admire the naked emperor’s clothes when everyone in the world can see his pitiful nudity, those who utter their disingenuous wishes to coexist in peace while choosing to live in a state of denial by refusing to acknowledge or remedy their injustices and wrong-doings, those who refuse to listen to the voice of reason and the call of justice, and muffle each and every whisper that asks for it, those who silence any call for GENUINE and TOTAL reconciliation and block every REAL endeavour that gives an honest diagnosis and point out to the genuine healing process which would lead to reconciliation, those who attempt to deceive the world by accusing every defiant and decent individual who insists on full restoration of rights, dignity and humanity of Palestinians, by accusing him/her of extremism, fanaticism or support of terrorism, and those who endeavour to cover the light of truth with a sieve of lies, are worthy only of their empty utterance.

In his book “Divided Jerusalem”, historian Bernard Wasserstein cites a 1978 planning scheme for Jerusalem that explicitly outlines “the underlying political motivation” for the city’s development policies – “Every area of the city that is not settled by Jews is in danger of being detached from Israel and transferred to Arab control”. This is what they are...hypocrites.

Read the Jewish history and you'll find for yourself that it transcends itself beyond factuality, truthfulness, or correspondence rules with any given vision of reality. Interestingly enough, history is not a particularly a “Jewish thing”. It is an established fact that NOT a single Jewish historical text has been written between the first century (Josephus Flavius) and early 19th century (Isaak Markus Jost). For almost 2,000 years Jews were not interested in their own or anyone else’s past, at least not enough to chronicle it. As a matter of convenience, an adequate scrutiny of the past was never a primary concern within the rabbinical tradition.

One of the reasons for their disinterest is probably that there was no need for such a methodical effort. For the Jew who lived during ancient times and the Middle Ages, there was enough in the Bible to answer the most relevant questions to do with day-to-day life, Jewish meaning and fate. As Israeli historian Shlomo Sand puts it, “a secular chronological time was foreign to the ‘Diaspora time’ that was shaped by the anticipation for the coming of the Messiah”.

ABOVE: Shalomo Sand. BELOW: Shalomo's book.

However, in the mid 19th century, in the light of secularization, urbanization and emancipation, and due to the decreasing authority of the rabbinical leaders, an emerging need of an alternative cause rose among the awakening European Jews. All of a sudden, they had to decide who they were and where they came from. They also started to speculate what their role might be within the rapidly opening Western society. This is where Jewish history in its modern form was invented. This is also where Judaism was transformed from a world religion into a “land registry” with some clearly devastating racially orientated and expansionist implications.

As we know, Shlomo Sand’s account of the “Jewish nation” as a fictional invention is yet to be challenged academically. However, the dismissal of factuality or commitment to truthfulness is actually symptomatic of any form of contemporary Jewish collective ideology and identity politics. The Zionist’s dismissal of a Palestinian past and heritage is just an example. But in fact any Jewish collective vision of the past is inherently Judaic-centric and oblivious to any academic or scientific procedure.

Gilad Atzmond mentions "When I was young and naïve I regarded history as a serious academic matter. As I understood it, history had something to do with truth seeking, documents, chronology and facts. I was convinced that history aimed to convey a sensible account of the past based on methodical research. I also believed that it was premised on the assumption that understanding the past may throw some light on our present and even help us to shape a prospect of a better future."

Gilad Atzmon

"I grew up in the Jewish state and it took me quite a while to understand that the Jewish historical narrative is very different. In the Jewish intellectual ghetto, one decides what the future ought to be, then one constructs “a past” accordingly. Interestingly enough, this exact method is also prevalent among Marxists. They shape the past so it fits nicely into their vision of the future. As the old Russian joke says, 'when the facts do not conform with the Marxist ideology, the Communist social scientists amend the facts (rather than revise the theory)'”.

"When I was young, I didn’t think that history was a matter of political decisions or agreements between a rabid Zionist lobby and its favorite Holocaust survivor. I regarded historians as scholars who engaged in proper research following some strict procedures. When I was young, I even considered becoming an historian. When I was young and naive, I was also somehow convinced that what they told us about our “collective” Jewish past really happened. I believed it all, the Kingdom of David, Massada, and then the Holocaust: the soap, the lampshade, the death march, the six million. As it happened, it took me many years to understand that the Holocaust, the core belief of the contemporary Jewish faith, was not at all an historical narrative, for historical narratives do not need the protection of the law and politicians. It took me years to grasp that my great-grandmother wasn’t made into a “soap” or a “lampshade”. She probably perished out of exhaustion, typhus or maybe even in a mass shooting."

"This was indeed bad and tragic enough. But it was not that different from the fate of many millions of Ukrainians who learned what communism meant for real. “Some of the worst mass murderers in history were Jews,” writes Zionist Sever Plocker on the Israeli news website Ynet, while disclosing the Holodomor and Jewish involvement in this colossal crime, probably the greatest crime of the 20th century. The fate of my great-grandmother was not any different from hundreds of thousands of German civilians who died in an orchestrated indiscriminate bombing because they were Germans. Similarly, people in Hiroshima died just because they were Japanese. One million Vietnamese died just because they were Vietnamese and 1.3 million Iraqis died because they were Iraqis. In short, the tragic circumstances of my great grandmother wasn’t that special after all...It took me years to accept that the Holocaust narrative, in its current form, doesn’t make any historical sense."

Sever Plocker

"Dagan’s interpretation of the photographic symbolism as a license to kill is rather banal yet common amongst Jews and Zionists in particular. However, this interpretation is far from being the only interpretation available. I haven’t seen the Photograph on Dagan’s wall but I guess that it must depict a devastatingly intense situation between a murderer in Nazi uniform and an oppressed Jewish man facing his death. However, Dagan and to a certain tragic extent, far too many Jews, are clearly fascinated by the role of the man with a rifle rather than with the ordeal of their collective grandfather, a defenseless venerable victim. Instead of grasping the Holocaust as a universal message against racism or oppression of any kind, Dagan and his Jewish State interpret the holocaust as a license to execute."

"In the late 1940’s a few sporadic Jewish thinkers insisted that after Auschwitz the Jews should position themselves at the forefront of the battle against evil. Not only has this NEVER happened, the Jewish state is now established as the leading danger for world peace. Moreover, Jewish lobbies enthusiastically support racist ideologies (Zionism) and push for colonial expansionist and interventionist conflicts around the world."

“This old Jew was my grandfather” says the Mossad’s chief. Indeed, after the big war many Jews wanted to believe that the Holocaust provided them with an entry card into humanity for the Holocaust redeems the Jews from the original sin of Crucifixion.'

"Killing Christ is realised symbolically as an assault on goodness, a crime against kindness and innocence. The cold blooded slaughter of peace activists in international waters has a very similar effect. It is an assault on compassion, righteousness and humanism. It is an attack on everything Christianity and Islam happen to value. As much as Israelis, Zionists and Neocons are insisting on spreading the deceptive myth of a Judeo-Christian alliance, it is this last Israeli crime that made it clear that the Jewish State shares nothing with humanism, Christianity or Islam. Israel in fact stands against any recognised Western value."

Uncle Hertzl says:

Your soul and body, your money, your wife and children. We are taking over the the goyim's world.

"Though the contemporary Israeli has no ethnic or biological lineage to the ancient Israelites, the merciless ideology repeats itself. Since, the Zionist project defines itself as a revival of the Biblical Israelite nation, it shouldn’t take us by surprise that the lethal Biblical ideology also comes to life. It is implemented daily against Palestinian women, children, elders and now against an international humanitarian convoy."

"By equating Christ's murder with last week's massacre in the high seas, we can then understand the total failure of the Israeli Hasbara machine. Instead of standing up and admitting that something went horribly wrong at sea, Israeli officials reverted to the usual spin. The Turkish activists had become ‘Jew haters’, ‘Al-Qaeda terrorists’, and the Mavi Marmara had become a ‘Boat of Hate’.This tactic is unfortunately too familiar. It has been employed by Rabbinical Judaism for two thousand years, especially against the memory of Christ."

I guess that Christians and Muslims will be shocked and outraged to find out that Yesh’u (יש"ו), the Hebrew name for Jesus, is an abbreviation that corresponds to the "May his name and memory be blotted out", an expression used for deceased enemies of the Jewish people like Hitler and Stalin. In the Hebraic culture, Jesus, the kindest of all people, the son of God, is regarded as the ultimate enemy. If Jesus is cornered with Hitler, it shouldn’t surprise us that Hasbara officials insist to stick Peace activists with Al-Qaeda. Seemingly, in the modern Israelite philosophy one becomes a Yesh’u hate figure once hit by an Israeli bullet."

"The Judaic hatred towards Jesus, as reflected by the Hebraic abbreviation Yesh’u is pretty revealing in the context of the latest Israeli massacre. Rather than accepting its crime and genuinely repenting, Israel attempted to portray the Turkish martyrs as the ultimate Jewish enemies. Seemingly, this attempt failed completely. The Free Gaza flotilla is now making it into a symbol of hope and compassion. Israel, on the other hand shoved itself into a corner."...."This is a tragic prophecy that fulfilled itself. Israel will never recover, it simply can’t."

"In 1844 Karl Marx argued that for humanity to liberate itself it first must emancipate itself of Judaism. Karl Marx was not at all a racist, he was probably referring to Jewish ideology (Jewishness) which he knew closely. I would maintain that if we want to find the road to humanism we must liberate ourselves of the Holocaust religion. The Holocaust as a message failed to become a universal call. Instead it matured into a tribal religion that opposes every value humanity and humanism have ever stood for."

"Many of us including me tend to equate Israel to Nazi Germany. Rather often I myself join others and argue that Israelis are the Nazis of our time. I want to take this opportunity to amend my statement. Israelis are not the Nazis of our time and the Nazis were not the Israelis of their time. Israel, is in fact far worse than Nazi Germany and the above equation is simply meaningless and misleading."

"The legendary Israeli humanist Israel Shahak wrote in the late 1980’s about his experience as a Jew under Nazi occupation: "if you enter a square from which there are three exits, one guarded by a German SS man, one by an Ukrainian and one by a Jewish policeman, then you should first try to pass the German, and then maybe the Ukrainian, but never the Jew."

Israel Shahak

A witness from amidst them:

Walter Rathenau, late Dictator of Germany, a Jew, 1921

 "The Jewish people as a whole will become its own Messiah. It will attain world domination by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship.

In this New World Order, the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state.

Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which it is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands."

Never the Jew, 
never the Jew, never the Jew