EGYPT: What do the Egyptian want which Washington hate to hear?

Jewish propaganda is getting dumber by the minuet, or maybe the Zionist Jews think people of yesterday are still as dumb as when they fell for their propaganda  and sedition tricks in the past. In the following article, a Zionist and Jewish trumpet is airing twisted propaganda the purpose of which is confusing the Western reader and throwing seeds of sedition amongst Middle Easterner. Deception is their motto, and they will stop at nothing  to achieve their goals even if it requires selling their mother's knickers.

 "Comment: Recent unrest in Arab world is not about us

By HERB KEINON 

01/30/2011 01:57 "

The above is the heading of an article posted on "Jerusalem on line". First of all what is taking place in Egypt right now is in no way "unrest", but a genuine revolution by the people for the people who have suffered for three decades under the rule of a dictator, American agent and security asset for the Zionist Jews in the rouge state of Israel.

Secondly, this revolution is about an array of reforms that need to be done in Egypt, and Egypt-Israel relation is one of the reforms. Hence my advise to the Zionist Israelis is to stop restoring to lying and deception in order to convince people with false allegations. Yes, the Egyptian revolution is about you, too.

Here goes the body of the article, and please notice that my comments are in Italic.

Quote:

How the Egyptian revolution debunks the Israel-is-the-cause-of-Mideast-instability myth.

First drop of shit:" Israel-is-the-cause-of-Mideast-instability myth.".  It is not a myth. It is a fact.

From an Israeli perspective, one of the most striking elements of the evolving revolution in Egypt, Tunisia and other parts of the Arab world is the degree to which all of this is not about us.

What a big load of steaming shit! The actual fact is it is not about you ONLY, but it is also about a whole array of other reforms that need be done in Egypt.

For the tens of thousands of protesters who took to Egypt’s streets over the weekend, defying the curfew and calling for the departure of President Hosni Mubarak, Israel and the Palestinians were simply not on the agenda. And the same was the case during the Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia earlier this month, and in the demonstrations intermittently taking place in Jordan, Yemen, Algeria and Morocco. No cries of death to Israel, no signs to “lift the siege” of Gaza, no chants against housing projects in Ariel.

Israel and Palestine have always been in the agenda since the inception of the rouge state of Israel. Demonstraters have more urgent demands right now: internal reforms which have been badly needed for decades but never addressed. That is why you do not see many signs reading the above slogans. Demands regarding form of elation with the Zionist states popped up, but not intensively right now, as it is not a priority right now. I find the mere intention of the writer is throwing seeds of sedition amongst Middle Easterners and confusing the Western reader. The trick won't work.

 

And to all those who would answer this by asking what kind of egotistical people would think that everything is about them, that they are the center of all regional developments, just consider what everyone from US President Barack Obama, to US Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen, to EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and to French President Nicolas Sarkozy have been saying for years: that the Israeli-Palestinian issue is the main source of foment and ferment in the Middle East. Remove that source of antagonism, this argument ran, move Israel out of the West Bank, stop building a new apartment complex in Gilo, and stability would be much easier to bring to the region.

If you are not egotistical nation then who is? You're the embodiment of racism, supremacism (Jews vs Goyim). And yes, if Israel is moved from the West Bank; the land usurped after 1967 war, and if a cease to illegal construction of settlement on Palestinian lands, and if an end is put to the biggest prison in the wold; apertheid Israel, stability would be much easier to bring to the region. Simple logic. What is so difficult about it to understand.

 

Really? Truly? Let’s imagine that two years ago Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas had accepted with open arms Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s offer of a Palestinian state on nearly 95 percent of the land, with a land swap for the rest, half of Jerusalem and an international consortium in control of the “Holy Basin,” would Mohamed Bouazizi in Tunisia not have set himself on fire, would rivers of people not be marching now in Egypt against Mubarak’s autocratic regime?

What a stupid argument! Maybe yes, maybe no, fortuneteller. But you are still a part of the equation. People are marching against Mubarak because of the corruption of his regime and because he, himself, is an American agent and valuable asset to the Jewish state of Israel that has been planted as a daggerin the back of the arab nation since 1948.

It’s clear that the tidal wave of popular anger against the Arab world’s “moderate” regimes would be washing over those regimes regardless of an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement.

What a hypocrite and twisted, the writer of this article is!  "moderate" regimes!!! And why would the people be washing over those so-called moderate regimes, if they are really moderate? Is it because they have nothing else to do?!

Why? Because Middle East instability is not about us – it is about them. It is about Arab unemployment, and Arab poverty, and Arab despair of a better future.

Is this a slip of tongue or a parasite stupidity? A while ago, the writer has described the regimes in the area: Morroco, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, Yemen, as "moderate". and in the same breath, the writer is saying that the Arabs are demonstrating, not about them, but about Arab unemployment, poverty (and corruption, inflation, etc) and despair for a better future. Well, if the so called "moderate" regimes are genuinely moderate, there would be nothing to demonstrate about.

One of the axioms repeated ad nauseum over the years by pundits around the world is that Arab despair breeds the radicalism that breeds the terrorism, and that the source of that despair is the Palestinian issue. Take that issue away and there will be far less despair, and thus far less terrorism. Hogwash.

Hogwash is the shit coming forth from the writer's mouth. The Palestinian issue can not be taken away from the equation in the Middle East. It is an integral part of Middle Easterners struggle.

 

True, there is hopelessness in the Arab world – but the source is not the Arab masses concern about the Palestinians; the source is the Arab masses concern about their own lives, their own unemployment and their own lack of freedoms. Fix that and you get stability; ignore that, and you get revolution.

The idiot is using the term "Arab masses" in the context as if the Palestinians are foreign to this masses. Deceptive words. Palestinians are Arabs, too. Hence, when it is said that Arabs concerned about their own lives; their own unemployment, and their own lack of freedoms, palestinans as Arabs will be part of  this concern. And while we are at it, talking about freedom, aren't people in Gaza living in the biggest open prison on earth.

But everyone – led by the US under Obama and the EU – ignored that, fixating instead on the building of another house in Ramat Shlomo, another apartment unit in Efrat. How many times have international leaders bewailed the humanitarian situation in east Jerusalem and in Gaza? How many statements have been issued expressing righteous indignation and concern? 

And how many apartment have been built for the Palestinians in East Jerusalem or the West bank? Do not the palestiniand have the right to ask the same question?

And, by comparison, how much attention did these same leaders pay to the humanitarian situation in Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen, Morocco, Jordan and Algeria – in the “moderate” Arab states. And which situation, really, threatens the stability of the region?

Again "moderate" Arab states. Repetition is a propaganda tool. And contradiction again: Why would the same leaders, by comparison, pay pay to the humanitarian situation in Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen, Morocco, Jordan and Algeria when those Arab states are moderate and not suppressing and torturing their people?

None of this, of course, gets Israel off the hook. The conflict with the Palestinians is real, it’s acute and huge efforts must be found to try and justly manage if not solve it. But this conflict also must be put in its proper perspective; it must not be magnified far beyond its true dimensions.

Oh now the writer is pouring some cold water; blowing on the soup in order for the reader to swallow this shit. The conflict is already as closer to its proper perspective as it could be, and Israel is definitely not off the hook. Palestinians have always extended their hands for peace, but, according to the latest leaks "Palestine papers", it has always been Israel who has let them down, because Israel has never been interested in peace.

When WikiLeaks began publishing US diplomatic cables in November, the world got a good glance at the degree to which the Arab leaders themselves did not see Israel – but rather Iran – as their main threat and the primary source of regional instability.

Of course and it is because those readers are corrupt to the core (one of the reasons they are embattled right now), and because they are not the people.

Now on the streets of Cairo, Tunis and Saana, the world is getting a good glance at what the people see as the main threat – their own governments.

Again, and I'll keep saying it..if the the governments are "moderate" why would people see them as their main threat?

Neither the people, nor the leaders, are holding Israel and the Palestinians up as the main problem. Is the West listening? Is Obama?

People in the whole Arab world as well as the Muslim world hold Israel up as the main problem in the Middle east.

Unquote..

And here comes my final comment. I am really in debt to the idiot writer of the above article as he/she spared me a great effort.for digging  his/her garve.

Whenever Israel committed an atrocity against the Arabs, the USA and Israel always raised up slogans that "Israel has the right to defend itself", "Israel has the right to exist"  and the likes. FINE! Giving the writer the benefit of doubt, If the above article is right, and the deminstrators in Morroco, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan and Yemen have not carried signs saying "death to Israel", and If israel is not a priority on the Egyptian revolution's agenda, and if the so-called "moderate regimes" are really moderate, then what is Israel afraid of? Why all the killing, the spying, the warring, the assassinating, the false propaganda, the lying, the deception...?

In answer to the heading of this posting: What do the Egyptian want which Washington hate to hear?,  here is a video clip of the army officer who joined the demonstrators in Cairo. He has summed up exactly what the Egyptians want. Demands are itemized below the video clip.

1. The end of the Mubarak regime and its apparatchiks
2. Constitutional reform
3. Free and fair elections
4. No more presidencies for life
5. An honest police force "like any developed country"