Explosions are being blamed on an "Iranian national." Until
now, China has refused to
support a war on Iran.
Iran's Foreign Ministry
spokesman, Ramin Mehmanparast, stated: "Israel
has bombed its embassies in New Delhi, India and Tbilisi,
Georgia to tarnish Iran's friendly ties with the host
countries," adding, "Israel
perpetrated the terrorist actions to launch psychological warfare against Iran."
False flag operations are a means by which the secret services of nations like the Israeli entity and the US Federal government rule the world. The Oklahoma City bombing in 1995 and the 9/11 terror attacks are but two examples of this.
The media are complicit by reporting the bombings in India and Thailand according to the American/Israeli script, rather than stating the fact that the Mossad is an organization known to have mastered false flag "black ops," and then launching an investigation into the likelihood that the recent attacks attributed to Iran are the work of the CIA and/or the Mossad.
Harvard University Prof. Steven M. Walt observes: "...two very capable states -- the United States and Israel -- threatening to attack a country that hardly seems worth the effort. The U.S. and Israel together spend more than $700 billion each year on their national security establishments; Iran spends about $10 billion. The U.S. and Israel have the most advanced military hardware in the world; Iran's weapons are mostly outdated and lack spare parts. The U.S. and Israeli militaries are well-educated and very well-trained; not true of Iran.
"The United States has thousands of nuclear weapons and Israel has several hundred, while Iran has a vast arsenal of -- zero. Iran does have a nuclear enrichment program (which is the reason for all the war talk), but the most recent National Intelligence Estimates have concluded that Iran does not presently have an active nuclear weapons program.
"The United States has several dozen military bases in Iran's immediate vicinity; Iran has exactly none in the Western hemisphere. The United States has powerful allies in every corner of the world; Iran's friends include a handful of minor nonstate actors like Hezbollah or minor-league potentates like Bashar al Assad (who's not looking like an asset these days) or Hugo Chávez.
"Moreover, the United States has fought four wars since 1990. It has bombed, invaded or occupied a half dozen countries in that period, leading to the deaths of thousands of people.
"Israel has been colonizing the West Bank since 1967, it invaded and occupied much of Lebanon from 1982 to 1999, andits armed forces pummeled Lebanon again in 2006 and Gaza in 2008-09.
False flag operations are a means by which the secret services of nations like the Israeli entity and the US Federal government rule the world. The Oklahoma City bombing in 1995 and the 9/11 terror attacks are but two examples of this.
The media are complicit by reporting the bombings in India and Thailand according to the American/Israeli script, rather than stating the fact that the Mossad is an organization known to have mastered false flag "black ops," and then launching an investigation into the likelihood that the recent attacks attributed to Iran are the work of the CIA and/or the Mossad.
Record of Terror by U.S.
and Israelis Dwarf Alleged Acts by Iran
Harvard University Prof. Steven M. Walt observes: "...two very capable states -- the United States and Israel -- threatening to attack a country that hardly seems worth the effort. The U.S. and Israel together spend more than $700 billion each year on their national security establishments; Iran spends about $10 billion. The U.S. and Israel have the most advanced military hardware in the world; Iran's weapons are mostly outdated and lack spare parts. The U.S. and Israeli militaries are well-educated and very well-trained; not true of Iran.
"The United States has thousands of nuclear weapons and Israel has several hundred, while Iran has a vast arsenal of -- zero. Iran does have a nuclear enrichment program (which is the reason for all the war talk), but the most recent National Intelligence Estimates have concluded that Iran does not presently have an active nuclear weapons program.
"The United States has several dozen military bases in Iran's immediate vicinity; Iran has exactly none in the Western hemisphere. The United States has powerful allies in every corner of the world; Iran's friends include a handful of minor nonstate actors like Hezbollah or minor-league potentates like Bashar al Assad (who's not looking like an asset these days) or Hugo Chávez.
"Moreover, the United States has fought four wars since 1990. It has bombed, invaded or occupied a half dozen countries in that period, leading to the deaths of thousands of people.
"Israel has been colonizing the West Bank since 1967, it invaded and occupied much of Lebanon from 1982 to 1999, andits armed forces pummeled Lebanon again in 2006 and Gaza in 2008-09.
"Prominent U.S. politicians have repeatedly called for "regime change" in Iran, and U.S. government officials now report that Israel has been murdering civilian scientists in Iran, in cahoots with the MEK, a terrorist organization that is still on the State Department's terrorist "watchlist." Iran's past conduct is far from pure, but it has done nothing remotely similar in recent years..."
As Prof. Walt points out, the United States and Europe are not actually threatened by Iran, even as we terrorize the Iranians with crippling sanctions, sabotage of their infrastructure and assassination of their scientists. All of these acts are, as Rep. Ron Paul has stated, acts of war.
Iran does threaten the status quo in two areas: in Palestine, where the rest of the world, including the Arab world, are sunk in complacency concerning the periodic masacres which the Israelis inflict and the ongoing theft and occupation of Palestinian land; and in countries such as Bahrain and Saudi Arabia which viciously repress Shiite populations. In Bahrain the Shia are a majority tyrannized by a Sunni minority.
Neither situation is any of our business. We should be sending medical and humanitarian aid and goodwill and cultural ambassadors to all sides in the Middle East, and otherwise taking a hands off approach to these never-ending religious wars which are none of our affair, especially in view of our "budget deficit."
Thanks to a Zionist-dominated American media however, and church leaders who teach that contemporary Israelis are genetic descendants of Abraham and the Israeli state is a Biblical (rather than a Talmudic) nation, we have a U.S. Congress which is Israeli-occupied territory.
Not all the fault is with the Traditional Enemies of Truth. For the past thirty years the Iranians and Syrians have done almost nothing to cultivate influence over the propagation and marketing of news and information in the United States. As a result of their neglect, quite naturally their enemies have obtained a monopoly on reporting conflicts to the American people.
If Iran does become a threat it will be due to the fact that we made them a threat and goaded them into attacking us, just as the administration of President Franklin D. Roosevelt did to Japan on the eve of America's entry into World War Two (cf. Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War, edited by George H. Nash; and Day of Deceit by Robert B. Stinnett).
We’ve forgotten the lies that prodded us into war just nine years ago
In a speech by then President George W. Bush of October 7, 2002, Bush cited alleged Iraqi chemical, biological and nuclear programs - as well as concerns about possible Iraqi connections to international terrorist groups. With respect to how close Iraq was to developing a nuclear weapon, Bush said that "we don't know exactly." He went on to state that "If the Iraqi regime is able to produce, buy, or steal an amount of highly enriched uranium a little larger than a single softball, it could have a nuclear weapon in less than a year."
In the face of requests that the U.S. provide further evidence in support of its position that Iraq was failing to comply with U.N. resolution 1441 and that a resort to military force would be necessary unless Iraq's behavior changed, Secretary of State Colin Powell addressed the U.N. Security Council on Feb. 5, 2003. The bulk of Powell's remarks involved his presentation of "additional information about what the United States knows about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, as well as Iraq's involvement with Al Qaeda associates. In his February 5 presentation to the U.N. Security Council, Secretary of State Colin Powell charged that Iraq had begun constructing mobile facilities to produce biological weapons.
On September 8, 2002, the New York Times published a front page article by Michael Gordon and Judith Miller about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction which was one of the most serious cases of misreporting in the entire run-up to the war. The piece provided a major boost to the administration’s case for war and proved to be wrong in almost every detail.
Michael Massing writes: "It was the prospect of Saddam Hussein’s getting an atomic bomb that caused the most fear about his regime, and it was this fear that the Bush administration most sought to fan as it pushed the case for war. Yet it had little concrete evidence to show that Iraq was actively seeking a bomb. Enter the New York Times. In that September 8 story, Gordon and Miller, leaning heavily on Bush officials, offered the aluminum tubes as evidence that Iraq was actively seeking a nuclear weapon. The article did not simply raise this as a possibility — it asserted it in bold and unequivocal language. 'US Says Hussein Intensifies Quest for A-Bomb Parts' ran the headline. Iraq, the lead declared, 'has stepped up its quest for nuclear weapons and has embarked on a worldwide hunt for materials to make an atomic bomb, Bush administration officials said today."
Another New York Times report by government mouthpieces Gordon and Miller, published on Sept. 13 was heavily slanted to the CIA’s position. It iced out critics of the claims that Iraq was trying to gain nuclear weapons and insulted the critics, trivializing and dismising them. Prior to Sept. 13 David Albright of the Institute for Science and International Security warned Judith Miller concerning her support for CIA claims. He states: "...an administration official was quoted as saying that 'the best' technical experts and nuclear scientists at laboratories like Oak Ridge supported the CIA assessment. These inaccuracies made their way into the story despite several discussions that I had with Miller on the day before the story appeared — some well into the night. In the end, nobody was quoted questioning the CIA’s position, as I would have expected."
Massing notes "...the Times‘s heavy reliance on official sources and its dismissal of other sources...on the critical issue of whether Iraq was actively seeking a nuclear bomb, the International Atomic Energy Administration (IAEA) had found strong indications that it was not. And how did the Times cover these key statements? With two short, pro forma stories buried inside the A section...The Times ran three front-page stories on Colin Powell's speech to the U.N. Security Council speech, one by Michael Gordon...Gordon offered unqualified praise for Powell's assertions about Iraq’s WMD. 'The case Mr. Powell presented today regarding Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction' was 'remorseless,' Gordon wrote. “Even the skeptics,” he added, 'had to concede that Mr. Powell’s presentation had been an important milestone in the debate. Critics may try to challenge the strength of the administration’s case and they will no doubt argue that inspectors be given more time. But it will be difficult for the skeptics to argue that Washington’s case against Iraq is based on groundless suspicions and not intelligence information.'
"On the nuclear issue, Gordon wrote, Powell 'presented new details to buttress the administration’s case;' in particular, he cited Powell’s claim that the United States 'has intercepted aluminum tubes that had a special coating that would make them useful for making centrifuges to enrich uranium.' Remarkably, Gordon did not see fit to mention the IAEA findings that undermined this claim and that he, Gordon, had twice written about in the previous month. So, at this key juncture in the debate on Iraq, Gordon uncritically transmitted a key US claim, one that the inspectors had effectively discredited. In the light of such reporting, is it any surprise that the IAEA findings had such limited impact?"
Doomed to repeat ruinous scripts from past wars
The American people continue to maintain faith in the credibility of the corporate media and as a result of this willful gullibility, they are on a nightmarish merry-go-round, doomed to repeat ruinous scripts from past wars like the war with Iraq, which was fought on the basis of a barrel of (now forgotten) lies about weapons of mass destruction and Iraqi tries to Al Qaeda.
Any armed resistance against Israeli occupation on the part of national liberation organizations such as Hezbollah, which years ago liberated the El Khiam concentration camp in Lebanon from the control of the Israeli proxies who ran that hellhole, is considered "terrorism." In the eyes of the West the sacred nation of fraudsters who deceitfully call themselves "Israel" cannot be opposed by force of arms. Shiite Islam views the Israelis as Nazis and uses the same tactics against them which the much hallowed partisans of World War Two employed against the Germans.
America's Talmudic mentality will not entertain the analogy however: bombing German Nazis is considered heroic; bombing Israeli Nazis is regarded as the lowest form of demonic evil. Unfortunately for the Zionist occupiers of the U.S. government and media, much of the rest of the world doesn't buy this Talmudic double-standard.
We doubt that the recent spate of bombings on the doorstep of China and Russia, and in India's backyard, will be viewed by the governments of those nations as Iranian in origin.
What a coincidence that the three nations most sympathetic to Iran are suddenly experiencing "Iranian" bombings within or near their territory.
SHADOW
WAR
Deconstructing
a Mossad dirty tricks campaign and how the media spin it
Some
important hints are dropped in this New York Times blog report,
beginning with its revealing title. In the corpus of the article we have
highlighted in boldface the passages which cumulatively constitute a Twilight
Language revelation. See our Afterword (below). This column is also
online, here.
Claim and
Counter-Claim in a Shadow War
LONDON — In war, truth is proverbially the first
casualty. The maxim also holds true for shadow wars, like the one
currently being waged between Iran
and its enemies.
Anyone trying to
make sense of the escalating tensions over Tehran’s nuclear ambitions is faced with a
bewildering array of claims and counter-claims, none of which would it be wise
to take at face value.
This week saw Iran and Israel
accusing each other of mounting bomb attacks in three countries — India, Georgia
and Thailand
— that were aimed at Israeli targets.
The identity of the
victims and intended victims establishes one element of a strong prima facie
case against Iran:
motive. It is logical to assume Iran
was striking back for a series of assassinations of its nuclear scientists and
unexplained explosions at military facilities, which Tehran has blamed on the Israeli intelligence
agency Mossad.
The nub of Iranian
allegations after this week’s attacks abroad is that Mossad was prepared to
put its fellow citizens in harm’s way in order to damage Tehran’s relations with the friendly
governments of the countries where the bombings took place.
“The Islamic
Republic of Iran regards the Zionist regime’s agents as perpetrators of such
terrorist actions with criminal and hidden purposes,” an indignant Ramin Mehmanparast, Iran’s foreign ministry spokesman,
told the press on Tuesday.
Mr. Mehmanparast’s
allegations of a Mossad dirty tricks campaign were somewhat undermined
when Thai authorities identified two arrested suspects as Iranians. A third
Iranian man was detained in Malaysia
and a female Iranian suspect was being sought. Thai police said the group’s
intended targets were Israeli diplomats.
Mr. Mehmanparast
will be placed in a quandary if investigations in Thailand link the suspects directly
to Iranian intelligence. The only logical way to maintain the charge of Israeli
responsibility then would be to assert that Mossad had somehow duped the
Iranians into mounting a series of bombing operations only to have Iranian
involvement exposed.
It is far-fetched,
but not impossible. As every reader of the spy novels of John le Carré or
Robert Ludlum knows, the machinations and motivations of undercover warriors
are never straightforward. Some decades ago, Mossad set up a Palestinian
“terrorist” in a London
flat as part of some nefarious black op, according to former British officials
familiar with the case. The Israeli agency’s failure to inform their
British counterparts put relations between the two services into deep freeze
for years. Spies are not above deceiving one another, even when they are
ostensibly on the same side.
In the recent chain
of events, however, it is difficult not to reach the conclusion presented by
Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s
prime minister, that either Iran
or its Lebanese ally Hezbollah was responsible. As my colleagues Scott Shane
and Robert F. Worth write, the latest outrages fit into a pattern of aggressive
behavior by an Iranian regime under pressure.
As for Hezbollah,
its leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah contradicted received Western wisdom this
month by saying Tehran would not ask his
movement to do anything if Iran
were attacked. Hezbollah, for its part, would have to sit and think about it.
What was his game?
Was he warning Iran
it would be on its own? If so, why the public statement rather than a private
message? Was it a trick to put their mutual enemies off the scent? In the
shady undercover war, you might need a John le Carré to decipher the answer.
Harvey Morris of
the New York Times opines that it is "logical" to assume and a
"prima facie" case can be made that Iran
was behind the Asian bombings because it wanted revenge for bombings in Tehran by Mossad. Au
contraire, there is nothing "logical" in attacking nations that are Iran's allies like India,
or a supplier, like Thailand.
Equally obtuse is
the claim by Morris that "... allegations of a Mossad dirty tricks
campaign were somewhat undermined when Thai authorities identified two arrested
suspects as Iranians."
Morris never heard
of patsies? Can he really believe that Mossad operations are only perpetrated
by Israelis carrying Israeli passports and with a "Star of David"
pinned on their back? False flag operations use foreign nationals; that's axiomatic.
Morris pretends he isn't aware of that. But wait -- he is aware of it! --
he admits that "decades ago" the Israelis "set up" a
"Palestinian" in London as part of a "black op." He just
can't believe they'd do anything like that in Thailand. Ha.
Morris: "...it
is difficult not to reach the conclusion presented by Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s prime minister, that either Iran
or its Lebanese ally Hezbollah was responsible."
Now the picture is
becoming a little clearer. The media up to this point in the Asian
"Iranian" bombings story have been presenting a simplistic black
hats/white hats dichotomy of terror in which Israeli secret services play fair
and act like Boy Scouts, while the Iranians are behind most every wickedness in
the world. This tale has failed to gain believers. To maintain the media's
credibility, Morris penned his blog with Revelation-of-the-Method hints
sprinkled throughout a report wherein he concludes, on specious grounds that
undercut the tenor of his own writing, that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu, who even Sarkozy of France calls a liar, is telling the truth.
The fact is, a case
of criminal terror can't be decided on the editorial page or in a blog essay. It
takes investigative reporting like that of the late, great Don Bolles of Arizona who specialized
in (and was assassinated because of) sticking his ballpoint pen in the darkest
corners of the rich and powerful. Mr. Bolles engaged in the type of reporting
the television news networks and the print media undertook when the US government
was in the hands of Richard Nixon, for whom the Establishment harbored a
residual fear, and the Vietnam War was raging. Now that Washington D.C.
is firmly in the grip of ZOG (the Zionist Occupation Government),
contrarian Leftist frogs have become the government's handsome prince
mouthpieces.
In the preceding
essay, Morris departs from the script slightly, with the System's blessing of
course, to both affirm and deny the Israeli account of the recent bombings.
This paradoxical approach gives the American public a vague and nebulous
impression that the media are perhaps not Mossad mouthpieces after all -- they
are just as puzzled and befuddled as the rest of us.
Morris is assuaging
nagging anxieties in the minds of savvy Americans over the "weird
coincidence" of India recently agreeing to defy the West's embargo and buy
Iranian oil, and then being almost immediately bombed by "Iranian
government agents."
To maintain faith
in Mossad's cover story, we are supposed to believe that the Iranians are that
stupid. Few people outside John Hagee's revival tent are swallowing it,
however. Enter the New York Times and their blogger Harvey Morris.
Notice how Morris
concludes his essay not with a rally-round-the-Mossad cheer, but with a
somewhat spine-tingling repeat of the counter-thread he has weaved throughout
his writing: the issue is shady and if we want an "answer" it
requires a pattern-detection oracle (John le Carré) to decipher what
still is a mystery.
Morris is
undercutting his own thesis and signaling that he has not actually reached a
conclusion that provides any answers. Talk about the "fog of war,"
this is the fog of journalism, intended to befuddle, while revealing the extent
of our befuddlement and then subtly spicing it with Netanyahu's spin.
When the Times publishes
checkerboard material like this, it's an indication that the Israelis have not
yet convinced the American people of their innocence.
That fact, in turn,
signals that independent Internet journalists with high audience numbers should
strike now in order to crack the facade and cast further doubt on Mossad and
the truthfulness of "our ally Israel," by publishing reports such as
we published for your benefit earlier this week -- Those
"Iranian" Bombings (read it online here).
Speaking of which,
if you are benefiting from our analysis, how about giving something in return?
If you haven't donated in the past three months consider doing so today, via
Paypal to: rarebooks14[at]mac[dot]com -- or click
here. Or buy a book, newsletter or recording here.
We are living in
interesting times. The big question is whether we can summon the will power,
organization and wisdom to rise to the challenge our adversaries have put
before us.
Deception
No comments:
Post a Comment
Say what is on your mind, but observe the rules of debate. No foul language is allowed, no matter how anger-evoking the posted article may be.
Thank you,
TruthSeeker