Third
Intifada Or Zionist Jihad: Israel
Escalates Tensions With Execution Style Force
Posted
by Editor
on October 20, 2015 in Activisim
& BDS, News &
Analysis, Palestine
| | 2
Responses
Call
it a religious crusade, a Jewish jihad or holy war. What’s clear is that
violence is escalating and Netanyahu has no strategy for addressing Palestinian
grievances short of more guns, more troops, more firepower and more blood (both
Israeli and Palestinian).
By
Richard Silverstein
SEATTLE — Each new day in the current round of strife in Palestine seems to bring news that more
Palestinians have been killed in increasingly gruesome ways by Israeli security
forces. Each day, more young people take to the streets with whatever weapon is
at their disposal in a heroic, and often fatal, effort to uphold the honor of
Al-Aqsa Mosque and the dignity of the Palestinian people.
Israeli
forces have reacted to the mounting violence with increasing levels of
brutality and desperation. There is no effort to compromise or negotiate, just
greater shows of force.
Protests
began last month, after Israeli authorities restricted access to Haram
al-Sharif. (Also known to Muslims as the Noble Sanctuary, it is the third
holiest site in Islam. Jews know it as the Temple Mount,
the site of an ancient Jewish temple.) Authorities deliberately limited the
numbers of Muslim worshippers permitted there during the period of the Jewish
High Holidays. This roused the anger of Palestinians, who suspect every
decision by Israel to be
motivated by a desire to change the status quo at the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound
in occupied East Jerusalem. At the same time,
the Israeli government approved a rising tide of settlers to make religious
pilgrimages to the site, further exacerbating tensions.
Over
the weekend, Gaza militants launched a missile
intercepted by Israel’s
Iron Dome missile defense system. In retaliation, an Israeli Defense Forces air
attack left a Palestinian mother and her 2-year-old child dead.
On
Monday, two Palestinian cousins, Ahmad Manasra, 13, and Hassan Manasra, 15,
from Beit Hanina, were suspected of stabbing two settlers in the occupied Jerusalem settlement of
Pisgat Zeev. An Israeli driver deliberately slammed his car into Ahmad,
breaking his legs. Police shot Hassan and left him to die.
This
video shows Ahmad after he was struck by the settler driver. Two Israeli
ambulances arrive and emergency medical personnel approach, stand over him, and
then withdraw. Bystanders curse the wounded 13-year-old boy, telling him: “Die,
you son of a bitch,” and goading police to shoot him.
As
of Wednesday, at least 31 Palestinians have been killed and as many as 1,200
others injured amid escalating clashes between Israeli security forces and
protesters in Gaza and the West
Bank in the past two weeks alone. During this period, eight Israelis have been killed and dozens others injured.
During
an emergency meeting of the Israeli security cabinet, which convened Tuesday
evening, the Israeli government imposed partial martial law on the Palestinians of East
Jerusalem. A statement issued by the Prime Minister’s Office said police are
authorized to “impose a closure on, or to surround, centers of friction and
incitement in Jerusalem,
in accordance with security considerations.” The Times of Israel further reports: “Other
courses of action approved by the security cabinet included the demolition of
terrorists’ homes within days of an attack and the banning on new construction,
the confiscation of the property of terrorists who carry out attacks and the
revoking of permanent residency rights. …
The
security cabinet also voted in favor of an NIS
80 million plan to recruit 300 guards to secure public transportation in Jerusalem. Earlier, it
was announced that the IDF would provide troops for this purpose until more
security guards can be recruited.”
Those
suspected of committing a terrorist act will have their residency permits
revoked, effectively expelling them from Jerusalem.
This is just one more instance in a series of acts of ethnic cleansing imposed by Israel.
This
is a return to the martial law regime which ruled over Israeli Palestinians
from 1948-1966. Under these regulations, they were not governed by civil law,
but by a military government which imposed a far more restrictive regime. This
new development is yet another sign of devolution from democratic rule and
values into a form of authoritarianism. It further reinforces the notion of
apartheid in which Israeli Jews enjoy superior rights to the Arab minority.
Who
is inciting this wave of violence?
On
Sunday, Israeli journalist Meron Rapoport quoted a series of
statements from various Israeli ministers and NGOs indicating that the
government is at fault for inciting the latest wave of protests. He quotes the
current culture minister, Miri Regev, who said a year ago: “It is unacceptable
that Muslims should have freedom of worship on the Temple Mount,
but not Jews.” Regev, who was former chairman of the interior for the Knesset
at the time, advocated a division of the site as exists at the Cave of the
Patriarchs, where Baruch Goldstein murdered 29 Palestinians in 1994. There, she
said, “it works fine,” as if depriving Muslims access to a portion of their
holy site would pass without incident.
Rapoport
also notes that an investigator for Ir Amim, an
NGO working to promote tolerance in the city sacred to three faiths, says that
for the past year, when there were no restrictions on Muslims’ access to the
holy sites, there was no unrest. But when the police limited access to Muslims
just before Rosh Hashana, protests erupted.
In
an interview with the Israeli news portal Walla, Gil Erdan, the internal
security minister, boasted that since he’d begun allowing ministers to visit
Al-Aqsa the number of Muslims permitted had decreased and the number of Jews
had increased six times.
Rapoport
also noted that Ulpan Shlishi, an Israeli TV newsmagazine, reported that Shmuel
Eliyahu, one of Israel’s most racist religious figures and a candidate to be
the nation’s chief rabbi, has been accosting Jewish youth no less than 100
yards from Al-Aqsa, asking whether they willing to join him in rebuilding the
Holy Temple.
The
government claims there has been no change in the status quo at the site held
sacred by both Jews and Muslims. Rapoport proves that indeed there has. But
even if there hadn’t, the plain fact is that Muslims perceive change, and Israel has done
nothing to persuade them otherwise.
No
less a figure than Shimon Baadani, a revered Israeli Sephardic rabbi, has denounced the settlers as provocateurs. Last week, Haaretz
reports, Baadani said during a radio program that Jews visiting the site
“sparked the current tumult.” He continued: “Do
not provoke the nations, even if we are in control here, there is a halachah. I
don’t know on whose authority they permit themselves to provoke and cause an
armed struggle like is happening now … they are forbidden.”
Palestinian NGO office ransacked by Israeli troops
On
Sunday, IDF soldiers raided
the Bethlehem offices of the International Middle East
Media Center,
a Palestinian human rights organization which documents the activities of
security personnel in the West Bank. Video
surveillance footage shows a gang of soldiers breaking into the office at 4
a.m. They rampaged through the facility, overturning and breaking computers,
destroying equipment and stealing files containing the records of informants.
After
a prior IDF break-in, the organization discovered that its informants were
later arrested and harassed by security forces and threatened for engaging in
the legal act of observing and documenting the actions of Israeli security
personnel.
Last
week, in one of the most heinous of a series of incidents in which Palestinians
were killed by Israeli security and police forces, Fadi Alloun, a 20-year-old man from the village of Issawiya,
was accosted by a mob of Israelis near Jerusalem’s
Old City. This unruly group, believing that
Alloun had stabbed an Israeli Jew, pursued him, screaming: “Shoot him, shoot
him!” They summoned the police, and when an officer arrived at the scene and
exited his vehicle, he immediately shot and killed the Palestinian with
multiple shots.
The
police justified this summary execution, claiming the
officer saw Alloun with a knife and “neutralized” him. The police spokesperson
even claimed the victim was taken to a hospital in “moderate condition,” but
the video clearly shows that Alloun was gravely wounded as soon as the officer
pumped multiple bullets into his body. No one has produced the knife allegedly
used in any stabbing attack or the one the officer allegedly saw upon arriving
at the scene. There was a report that an Israeli teenager had been stabbed in
that general vicinity earlier in the evening, but police have not tied Alloun
to that attack.
Two
recent reports cast increasing doubt on the “official” version of events.
Writing for Haaretz, Amos
Harel argues that if there was a stabbing, it was not a terror attack.
Indeed, he noted, no one has shown that Alloun was the attacker. The version published in the English edition does not include this
critical passage. Harel writes that there was a confrontation of some sort
between an Israeli Jew and Palestinian (possibly Alloun), but he explicitly
states it was not terror-related.
In
a media context in which every major Israeli newspaper reports definitively
that Alloun was a “terrorist” who stabbed a Jewish youth, Yossi
Melman cautions that this is only the police version of events. For those
schooled in the reporting nuances of Israeli media, and given the prior media
rush to judgment, this is a clear indication that Melman has strong doubts
about this narrative.
Over
the weekend, a freelance journalist and Palestinian investigator for Human
Rights Watch wearing a clearly marked “Press” sign, was shot three times — twice with rubber bullets, and once with
live ammunition — by Israeli forces as she documented and photographed a
protest. She could easily have been killed. Israeli forces have been known in
the past to directly target and even kill Palestinian journalists covering unrest in a
systematic assault on the press.
Police
shoot mentally-ill Palestinian woman repeatedly at point-blank range
Israa
Zidan Taufik Abed, a 30-year-old Palestinian woman with a history of mental
health issues, was confronted by no fewer than nine heavily armed soldiers as
she allegedly stood holding a knife at the Afula bus station last week.
A
video
documenting the incident shows that she never approached the officers nor
threatened them in any way. In fact, one bystander appears to goad an officer
into shooting her by intruding on the scene and shouting at him.
An
Israeli, who is a trusted source and has examined the video closely, says that
from one angle he believes he can make out a knife. But a second video shot
from another angle does not show it. And, it’s important to note here, no one
has produced a weapon.
One
soldier claims Abed tried to stab him, but no evidence of such an attack has
been produced. There is a prevailing narrative in Israel that she was a terrorist and
that she stabbed or attempted to stab a police officer. Though she may have had
a knife, the video does not support the claim she attacked anyone before being
shot. In fact, the Times of Israel, a Likudist media outlet reports that it’s likely this was not a terror attack at
all, but the act of a mentally unstable woman.
Instead
of using alternative means to defuse the situation and disarm Abed, the
security personnel on the scene shouted at her. With no one appearing to be in
command of the situation, one soldier shot her six times.
Abed
was severely wounded, but she will likely survive, unlike Hadil
al-Hashlamoun, the Palestinian student shot by the IDF multiple times at a Hebron checkpoint. Abed
is a mother of three children, a PhD student in chemical engineering at the
Technion, and the daughter of a prominent imam in Nazareth.
Settler
desecrates Palestinian body with pork
In
yet another incident, a Palestinian, Muhammad Jaabari, wounded an Israeli
soldier lightly in a knife attack. He was shot and mortally wounded.
Emergency medical personnel arrived and attempted to revive him. During their
efforts a settler thrust himself into the scene and threw a piece of raw pork
on top of the Palestinian body. None of the security or medical personnel at
the scene intervened to stop him.
In
a radio interview, the deputy director of the Kiryat Arba municipal council
defended the action, calling it “entirely reasonable” in light of the “refusal”
of the armed forces to deal with the security situation appropriately.
This
was clearly an act of provocation of the sort Pastor Terry Jones engaged when he burned Qurans publicly.
And it has but one purpose: to inflame Muslim sentiment and provoke an all-out
religious war.
A significant portion of the Israeli public believes there
must be a final reckoning in which the Palestinians are finally defeated. Some
believe this should be accomplished through ethnic cleansing, the forced removal of Palestinians.
Others foresee concentration camps for those Palestinians who
refuse to “see reason” and leave voluntarily. Among the most extreme are those
who believe in outright mass extermination. The Israeli political
narrative is now being driven by a settler movement intent on eventually
destroying Haram al-Sharif and replacing it with a rebuilt Third Temple
(earlier First and Second
Temples were sacked by
Babylonians and Roman invaders, respectively).
Criminalizing
Palestinian political leadersP
Over
the weekend, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, seeking to curry favor
with his extremist constituency, directed the country’s attorney general to open an investigation against MK Haneen Zoabi for criminal
incitement of violence. In a recent interview with a Hamas newspaper, she
called for “hundreds of thousands” of Palestinians to converge on Al-Aqsa
mosque for a “true intifada,” or popular uprising.
This
is part of an ongoing official campaign to criminalize Palestinian political
representation. At one time or another, almost every Palestinian MK is investigated by police on
trumped up charges or consorting with the enemy or inciting violence. It
appears only a matter of time before MKs representing the Palestinian community
will be expelled from the Knesset by the Jewish majority, either individually
or en masse. The Israeli supreme court has rejected some decisions along these
lines in the past. But the court, following massive pressure from the
nationalist right, is increasingly reflecting such views and can no longer be
relied upon to restrain the most extreme manifestations of Israeli racism.
Israel is contemplating a ban on the leading Islamist group
in the Palestinian community, the Islamic Movement, which has led the call for
resistance to settler and police assaults on the Haram al-Sharif. In order to
offer a semblance of balance, they’re also considering banning the most extreme settler group, Lehava. The problem
with this approach is that criminalizing the views of the majority of the Palestinian
population will do nothing to resolve the underlying issues.
In
this context, it becomes almost irrelevant to determine whether this is the
advent of the Third Intifada. Call it a religious crusade, a Jewish jihad or
holy war. What’s clear is that violence is escalating and Netanyahu has no
strategy for addressing Palestinian grievances short of more guns, more troops,
more firepower and more blood (both Israeli and Palestinian).
IDF
gives shoot-to-kill orders against Palestinian civilians
Israel activist Eran Efrati, who maintains close
relationships with IDF soldiers in the field, described an alarming development
in the rules of engagement as explained by senior officers. In a Facebook post
on Sunday, he writes: “In
recent days … soldiers in the Israeli army … tell me that their rules of
engagement were changed entirely and that procedures that were true to a
certain extent only in Gaza and parts of the West Bank are now being
implemented all across Palestine and Israel, ‘free permits’ to open live-fire
on any Palestinian citizen who seems suspicious,
All
of the soldiers were talking about the orders they receive that completely
eliminate the apprehension of a suspect or even the ‘suspect arrest procedure’
the infamous IDF practice as well as any attempt to stop or talk with ‘a
suspect.’
One
of the soldiers stationed in Hebron said that a senior officer who arrived to
brief them over the weekend told them ‘It will not look good if the settlers
(most of whom have a more upgraded weapons than some of the soldiers
themselves, [weapons] they [the settlers] received from the army) would murder
suspects on the streets and that [in confrontations] we need to react faster
and neutralize them (the Palestinians) before the settlers will.’
If
these things are true, then senior officers in the Israeli army are briefing
soldiers to assassinate Palestinians to prevent settler violence …. [W]e very
might be at the start of a bloodbath, the Israeli public in its current state
will not be content and will not settle as usual for the current situation to
calm down, The images and sounds from Jerusalem
and Afula make it clear they want to see blood.”
Gaza journalist Mohammed Omar confirms this in his eyewitness testimony
published in Middle East Monitor on Sunday: “The
protesters have today returned once more but…the mood is increasingly sour.
Most openly talk about how the rules of the game have changed, and how
protesters appear to have become fair game. Young people who survived the
weekend’s mass shooting on the border said that during many clashes in Khan
Younis, Israeli troops opened fire at short distance with live ammunition.”
He
continues, relaying the experiences of others on the ground, including a young
man who drove his wounded friend to the hospital on Friday, journalists who
agree that it seems “live bullets were fired at specific targets,” and doctors
who said “they were shocked at the numbers of victims with precise bullet
wounds, which they say appeared to be deliberately aimed not to injure, but to
kill or cause the maximum amount of damage.”
If
the IDF is indeed using live fire to deliberately murder Palestinian civilians
— protesters engaged in legitimate dissent against Israeli policies restricting
their access to Muslim holy places — this must be investigated as a possible
war crime.
It’s
important to note that Jewish terrorists are never shot, let alone murdered,
when apprehended in the midst of an attack. After a Jew stabbed
three Palestinians and a Bedouin in Dimona over the weekend, not a hair on
his head was mussed. When Yaakov
Schlissel murdered an Israeli woman at the Jerusalem Gay Pride Parade this
summer, he wasn’t harmed in any way. The only Jewish terrorists ever killed
during commission of their acts of mass murder were Baruch Goldstein and Eden
Natan Zenda, who were killed by their Palestinian victims. There are Israeli
Jews who have the temerity to condemn Palestinians for taking the law into
their own hands in these cases.
While
Israel
burns, the Obama administration and the rest of the world don’t even bother to
fiddle like the Roman Emperor Nero. They ignore the rivers of blood flowing in
the streets of Palestine.
They have no plan. They’re satisfied to allow things to continue on as they
have for nearly 70 years of spasmodic violence. Writing for The Guardian on
Sunday, Marwan Barghouti cautioned: “[I]n
the absence of international action to end Israeli occupation and impunity or
even provide protection, what are we asked to do? Stand by and wait for the
next Palestinian family to be burned, for the next Palestinian child to be killed or arrested, for the next settlement to be built? The entire world knows that Jerusalem is the flame
that can inspire peace and ignite war. Why then does the world stand still
while the Israeli attacks against the Palestinian people in the city and in
Muslim and Christian holy sites, notably Al-Haram al-Sharif, continue unabated?
Israel’s
actions and crimes not only destroy the two-state solution on 1967 borders and
violate international law, they threaten to transform a solvable political
conflict into a never-ending religious war that will undermine stability in a
region already experiencing unprecedented turmoil.”
It
almost breaks my heart to say that the only development that can get the world
to an act is organized mass murder like Srebrenica or Rwanda.
But do we really have to wait for an act of mass killing so severe that the
world can no longer avert its gaze?




































































































No comments:
Post a Comment
Say what is on your mind, but observe the rules of debate. No foul language is allowed, no matter how anger-evoking the posted article may be.
Thank you,
TruthSeeker